Right, so your only justification that Vermaelan is apparently better than Hummels is the differences in the leagues?
Well, that must mean Arteta is better than Gotze, that RVP is better than Messi.
Moron.
Yep, as goals scored is a huge indication of how good a defender is :lol:
Firstly I've been talking specifically about the difference between the leagues for CENTREBACKS. The difference is more pronounced there than at other positions. I've read numerous players who've played in England as well as other countries talk about the difference.
Being a central defender in England is harder than anywhere else on the planet. So I'd take a great defender from England before I'd take a great defender from Germany. It's a lot harder to be a great CB in the former.
And I didn't say goals scored was a "huge indication", just another facet of the game where Vermaelen is superior.
The very same that you wanted sacked at the beginning of the season?
I did want him sacked. But not because of his player development skills. IMO he's second to none in that area. I wanted him sacked because of his failings in the transfer market. In the last two years we had a chance to get Eden Hazard, Mario Gotze, Gary Cahill and Phil Jones all for money we could have afforded.
Phil Jones was available for $10m in January...6 months before SAF got him for $16m (and he described 16 as a bargain).
That's why I was upset with Wenger and wanted him gone. But his player development ability has never been questioned. In fact, if Nasri and Clichy go on to become failures at City like I expect them to, it'll be only further proof of his genius in that area.
Now if only he combined that genius with a little more selective aggressiveness in the transfer market, we'd be right.