Luke Brooks

[Vic Mackey]

Just reporting in for @stryker for my weekly round of work comp tipping abuse:

View attachment 47515

mate honestly we're all sad enough, why'd you have to go and make the tank your profile pic?

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

I cant defend him anymore. He needs to leave, both for his and the clubs sake

Yep. Yesterday drew a line under it.

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

mate honestly we're all sad enough, why'd you have to go and make the tank your profile pic?

Ok. I’ll change it.

 

[gordsy]

I was surprised to see him revving up his team mates in the 2nd half when Tamou got hooked. It was a passion and fire in his belly I haven’t seen from him before

some fans are extreme though. Blaming Brooks for that diabolical 1st half is laughable

If only he could play with skill, timing, brains, commitment and a kicking game he'd go alright

Seriously though, he is gone and has been for ages. A change of scenery frees him up and gets us away from him.

Hopefully we put his, Packers and BJ's money towards, tacklers. Sack everyone who is a shit tackler and just buy people who can tackle and a few props to play bash and barge. Stuff attacking footy, we have no decent halves anyway, so sack the pansies and play ugly footy.

 

[Zoe Palmer]

Weren’t all the tries scored on Doueihi’s side of the field?

Most of them, yes. He was passive, once again, in both defense & attack.

a shocking game. His go to play with the ball is to walk 2 or 3 steps sideways and drop a predictable pass back inside to a flat footed forward.

A draught horse runs with more passion and vigour

 

[Tiger05]

Most of them, yes. He was passive, once again, in both defense & attack.

a shocking game. His go to play with the ball is to walk 2 or 3 steps sideways and drop a predictable pass back inside to a flat footed forward.

A draught horse runs with more passion and vigour

That is pretty harsh criticism of one of our best two players. I have Luc and AD as the our two best players.

Yep Douiehi has heaps of holes in his game right now but he has more upside than basically all of our players.

 

[Speedy Gonzales]

If only he could play with skill, timing, brains, commitment and a kicking game he'd go alright

Seriously though, he is gone and has been for ages. A change of scenery frees him up and gets us away from him.

Hopefully we put his, Packers and BJ's money towards, tacklers. Sack everyone who is a shit tackler roosters just and just buy people who can tackle a few props to play bash and barge. Stuff attacking footy we have no decent halves anyway so sack the pansies and play ugly footy.

I agree and I have been supportive of Brooks for awhile
Moving him on would probably be best for both parties. It’s time to go in a different direction

We should try the Ricky Stuart approach. Those Poms are tough pricks

 

[Speedy Gonzales]

Most of them, yes. He was passive, once again, in both defense & attack.

a shocking game. His go to play with the ball is to walk 2 or 3 steps sideways and drop a predictable pass back inside to a flat footed forward.

A draught horse runs with more passion and vigour

I even mentioned at the game I thought he stifled what little attacking opportunity we had in the 1st half, game plan or not, the ball just always stopped with him

our halves were far from the issue anyway. Our lack of passiveness in our line speed and effort as a TEAM was embarrassing for first grade

 

[Pezz70]

I even mentioned at the game I thought he stifled what little attacking opportunity we had in the 1st half, game plan or not, the ball just always stopped with him

our halves were far from the issue anyway. Our lack of passiveness in our line speed and effort as a TEAM was embarrassing for first grade

Being reported that there might be a swap Brooks for Reynolds on the near horizon.

 

[Speedy Gonzales]

Being reported that there might be a swap Brooks for Reynolds on the near horizon.

Probably fluff. I don’t see how that swap automatically fixes our line speed, or atrocious edge defense

 

[Vozzy]

I'm all for change at halfback going forward but it was by far not Like Brooks who was really to blame on the weekend. It was just the sides defense and the starting pack was bad early especially the front rowers. Like yes blame Brooks from a season point if view but not for this game.

 

[Front-Rower]

Probably fluff. I don’t see how that swap automatically fixes our line speed, or atrocious edge defense

You’d be surprised what a talkative halfback can do.

When Prince was at his best with us he made a lot of ordinary players look very good..

 

[Speedy Gonzales]

You’d be surprised what a talkative halfback can do.

When Prince was at his best with us he made a lot of ordinary players look very good..

Yeah but Reynolds?

feels like a stop gap solution and we’ll be back to square 1 again in a year or two

 

[Ron's_Mate]

would Reynolds even want to sign with the Tigers?

 

[Mr_Raditch]

Being reported that there might be a swap Brooks for Reynolds on the near horizon.

That was just MG trying to fill airtime on his Radio show. Will never happen.

 

[Tiger05]

would Reynolds even want to sign with the Tigers?

Everyone wants to sign for the Tigers.

 

[Everlovin' Antichrist]

Being reported that there might be a swap Brooks for Reynolds on the near horizon.

I got a semi just reading that.

 

[Zoe Palmer]

Being reported that there might be a swap Brooks for Reynolds on the near horizon.

Souths & Brooks would be the winners in that scenario

 

[The Charlatan]

I got a semi just reading that.

Only a semi?

 

[Marshall_magic]

Being reported that there might be a swap Brooks for Reynolds on the near horizon.

it’s a con act. You’ll be expecting that Souths bloke but instead it will be “the competitor” coming back from England. Now with 50% more injury problems.