What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Manly/Storm fight

B

Beachy Eagle

Juniors
Messages
618
People on here carrying on about the sentences and the weeks obviously don't understand the sytem.
Brett Stewart was charged with a grade 3 Contrary Conduct carrying 360 base points so he would have bben facing 3 weeks, but as he has a perfect record for more than 7 years he recieved a 25% reduction and for an early gui;ty plea he recieved a further 25% reduction leaving him with 180 points and a weeks + carry over points.
SO... carrying on about the NRL giving him a week off is rediculious, also comparing him to players with very patchy judiciary histories is completely irrelivant.
For the record had he had a previous offence in the past 2 years we would have recieved 20% penalty meaning 430 points and 4 weeks, so it is only his perfect record that saved his season.
 
ceagle

ceagle

Bench
Messages
4,853
BunniesMan said:
Funny you should mention that. That Dave Taylor could get 5 weeks for a tackle that had nothing in it, while someone who throws punches while 5 on 1 gets less is ridiculous. Lussick getting a lesser sentence than Taylor shows how dumb the NRL judiciary system is.
Click to expand...
Can't blame the judiciary for wanting to lol@souffs
 
mikail-eagle

mikail-eagle

Bench
Messages
2,797
Beachy Eagle said:
People on here carrying on about the sentences and the weeks obviously don't understand the sytem.
Brett Stewart was charged with a grade 3 Contrary Conduct carrying 360 base points so he would have bben facing 3 weeks, but as he has a perfect record for more than 7 years he recieved a 25% reduction and for an early gui;ty plea he recieved a further 25% reduction leaving him with 180 points and a weeks + carry over points.
SO... carrying on about the NRL giving him a week off is rediculious, also comparing him to players with very patchy judiciary histories is completely irrelivant.
For the record had he had a previous offence in the past 2 years we would have recieved 20% penalty meaning 430 points and 4 weeks, so it is only his perfect record that saved his season.
Click to expand...

Spot on Beachy. All those Manly haters should read this and zip it.
Besides, the NRL owe Brett 4 weeks for wrongfully suspending him back in 2009.
 
B

Beachy Eagle

Juniors
Messages
618
mikail-eagle said:
Spot on Beachy. All those Manly haters should read this and zip it.
Besides, the NRL owe Brett 4 weeks for wrongfully suspending him back in 2009.
Click to expand...
No they don't owe him anything, and this is not a square up.
Ther review pannel call the offense as they see fit, they saw B Stewarts actions as a grade 3 contrary conduct, wich on its own is a pretty heft charge.
The fact that he is a complete clean skin and this is his first real brain snap (and it was a beauty) has saved him.
 
mikail-eagle

mikail-eagle

Bench
Messages
2,797
Beachy Eagle said:
No they don't owe him anything, and this is not a square up.
Ther review pannel call the offense as they see fit, they saw B Stewarts actions as a grade 3 contrary conduct, wich on its own is a pretty heft charge.
The fact that he is a complete clean skin and this is his first real brain snap (and it was a beauty) has saved him.
Click to expand...

Yeh I know its not. Just trying get under some peoples skin who don't wanna give Brett a break.

By the way, it's bloody Rothfield who thinks its all a square up.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/n...-square-with-nrl/story-e6frfgbo-1226124884324
 
S

super_coach

First Grade
Messages
5,061
All the minor charges were on the money and previous records should and will help players reduce their time on the side lines.

As for Blair and Glen Stewart, Iam afraid they are gone, they have been trailed before the media and everyone wants plenty of blood. They will get the rest of the season for sure.

Both clubs final campaign will be dealt a massive blow as both players play such a big part in both attacking and defensive structures at their respective clubs. I think the whole thing has been blown up by the media and it a shame two players have probably played their last game for the season
 
N

nrlnrl

First Grade
Messages
6,833
apparently Manly are going to defend the charge against Glenn Stewart because of a loophole in the judiciary system...haven't heard the details yet - wondering if anyone has & can share the info ?
 
ceagle

ceagle

Bench
Messages
4,853
nrlnrl said:
apparently Manly are going to defend the charge against Glenn Stewart because of a loophole in the judiciary system...haven't heard the details yet - wondering if anyone has & can share the info ?
Click to expand...
keep watching channel 9
 
gallagher

gallagher

Juniors
Messages
1,800
nrlnrl said:
apparently Manly are going to defend the charge against Glenn Stewart because of a loophole in the judiciary system...haven't heard the details yet - wondering if anyone has & can share the info ?
Click to expand...
Arko just replaced gallop as CEO. Stewart will be sweet.
 
ceagle

ceagle

Bench
Messages
4,853
nrlnrl said:
apparently Manly are going to defend the charge against Glenn Stewart because of a loophole in the judiciary system...haven't heard the details yet - wondering if anyone has & can share the info ?
Click to expand...
Oh, just saw that Weidler is reporting it, it will be a bullshit nothing story
 
N

nrlnrl

First Grade
Messages
6,833
After hearing the audio on Ch9, they might have a point. Glenn Stewart was sin-binned on the advice of referee Gavin Badger who said he ran a distance & threw punches. In Manly's favour, Glenn Stewart didn't throw any punches in the "1st brawl". Therefore, Badger's evidence is incorrect.
 
ceagle

ceagle

Bench
Messages
4,853
nrlnrl said:
After hearing the audio on Ch9, they might have a point. Glenn Stewart was sin-binned on the advice of referee Gavin Badger who said he ran a distance & threw punches. In Manly's favour, Glenn Stewart didn't throw any punches in the "1st brawl". Therefore, Badger's evidence is incorrect.
Click to expand...
So that means the whole thing should of been prevented in the first place?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top