Every club has their f*ckwit supporters that spoil things for the genuine fans :roll:Fire, if you feel the need to carry on like this at least remove the St.George/Illawarra brand logo.
Every club has their f*ckwit supporters that spoil things for the genuine fans :roll:Fire, if you feel the need to carry on like this at least remove the St.George/Illawarra brand logo.
Fire, if you feel the need to carry on like this at least remove the St.George/Illawarra brand logo.
That was me, and it was because you broke the rules. No one is allowed to make posts in the open forum that create potential legal issues for this website or yourself. The decision as to what constitutes libel is decided by the site administrators. We take it seriously. If anyone thinks they are above these rules, they will have to find another website's forum to post in. I don't care which team you support.Good example from a Moderator. Are you the soft c#nt who has been deleting my posts for libel?
:lol::lol: Well played sir!!!Not the Raiders we are all pretty sensible after a loss.
No excuse for a hit like that, quite likely his mental state is affecting his football at present though.So Prior has an excuse for intentionally elbowing someone in the head now?
:crazy:
No excuse for a hit like that, quite likely his mental state is affecting his football at present though.
Pretty bad hit, 10 weeks or so for that. lol at people saying this needs ten weeks but a similar result (heavy contact to the head) from a shoulder charge somehow doesnt warrent suspension (ala Te'o, Pritchard etc). f**kin idiots.
The result is much the same, heavy contact to the head. Worse in the case of Groat and Simmons. Might not be deliberately aimed at the head but the Shoulder Charge is most definately a deliberate effort to cause damage. And the very nature of the shoulder charge, where the person executing the shoulder charge does not have eyes for the player, makes it liable to go horribly wrong. The onus is on the tackler to avoid contact with the head so when they f**k up it's suspension worthy.lol at people who lol at people and can't understand the difference between having intent to deliberately attack the head, and not having the intent to deliberately attack the head.
The result is much the same, heavy contact to the head. Worse in the case of Groat and Simmons. Might not be deliberately aimed at the head but the Shoulder Charge is most definately a deliberate effort to cause damage. And the very nature of the shoulder charge, where the person executing the shoulder charge does not have eyes for the player, makes it liable to go horribly wrong. The onus is on the tackler to avoid contact with the head so when they f**k up it's suspension worthy.
Yet people think hits like Te'o's and Pritchards arent worthy of suspension :lol:
The result is much the same, heavy contact to the head. Worse in the case of Groat and Simmons. Might not be deliberately aimed at the head but the Shoulder Charge is most definately a deliberate effort to cause damage. And the very nature of the shoulder charge, where the person executing the shoulder charge does not have eyes for the player, makes it liable to go horribly wrong. The onus is on the tackler to avoid contact with the head so when they f**k up it's suspension worthy.
Yet people think hits like Te'o's and Pritchards arent worthy of suspension :lol:
Why should I use common sense when so many people seem to think someone putting their shoulder into somones head, causing serious injury, doesnt warrent suspension? Common sense is a detriment on this f**king forum.A shoulder charge gone wrong and a player who intentionally c*cks his elbow and aims it at the opposing players head are two completely different things.
For one.......shoulder charges aren't illegal.
Using an elbow in any form is.
Use some common sense.