It is most likely to be the $$$$$. Doust is always looking for a bargain and Mary comes cheap. Mary's appointment solves some Boardroom politics and at first sight, is a very economical solution.
Time will tell whether this gamble proves to be a winner. My view is that the Board should not be taking such risks with regards to the prosperity of our Club. I would have thought the events of the past 3 years would have had a huge impact on the Board Member's attitude on such matters however, it seems not to be the case.
I agree its a gamble, but unless you're getting Bennett or Bellamy, any coaching appointment is a gamble.
Definitely Mary wasn't my first choice, but when Bennett turned us down, I didn't really see any other options. Sure names like Sheens, Smith and Taylor were talked about, but none of those options filled me with confidence either. Based on what I've seen in the last half of the season, at least the players have responded to Mary which is a step in the right direction.
Unfortunately, I think we're still a couple of years away. We won't be able to contend until:
1. the backs develop some combinations (including sorting out the fullback and centre positions once and for all)
2. addition of 2 props and a hooker (maybe another edge backrower as well)
3. bring through some of our better juniors (Dufty and Bird)
Its up to Mary to oversee the above...hopefully he can do it.