MELBOURNE 3rd Test: Australia v India on Dec 26-30, 2014

[WaznTheGreat]

Darren Lehmann is the biggest disgrace in the history of disgraces if he doesn't man up and sack Watto.

 

[Bazal]

You can't drop Watson when Shaun Marsh is still in the team. Marsh has to go first.

Why? Nonsense.

 

[BunniesMan]

When will we realise that one of Smith or Clarke should be at 3 and the other at 4?

I don't understand how Clarke hasn't been there until now and when he got injured Smith should have slotted in.

 

[butchmcdick]

You can't drop Watson when Shaun Marsh is still in the team. Marsh has to go first.

Watto must go

Bring back Quiney, jono hastings and the big show.....

 

[BunniesMan]

Why? Nonsense.

Because as crap as Watson is he is 100 times the player Marsh is. Watson has played a role as a bowler at least. Marsh has done nothing at test or 1st class level his entire life.

 

[Bazal]

Watto must go

Bring back Quiney, jono hastings and the big show.....

Bring back Andrew McDonald!

 

[some11]

Hope Clarke enjoyed watching that one from a spectators point of view.

Time for a new 3 and Wazn to retire from test cricket.

 

[vvvrulz]

Magnificent from Ishant, that's 1-121 in the test so far

 

[Twizzle]

I'd drop him for MMarsh

 

[Bazal]

Because as crap as Watson is he is 100 times the player Marsh is. Watson has played a role as a bowler at least. Marsh has done nothing at test or 1st class level his entire life.

Marsh is fill in for an injured player down the order. He is completely, totally, utterly irrelevant to keeping or dropping Shane Watson.

 

[BunniesMan]

Watson might be the worst 50 test player ever. Shaun Marsh is the worst 10 test player ever.

 

[typicalfan]

Because as crap as Watson is he is 100 times the player Marsh is. Watson has played a role as a bowler at least. Marsh has done nothing at test or 1st class level his entire life.

100 times?

 

[BunniesMan]

Marsh is fill in for an injured player down the order. He is completely, totally, utterly irrelevant to keeping or dropping Shane Watson.

He is not irrelevant at all. Competent selectors would not leave Watson out of a team Marsh is in. They're both top 6 players. If you have other players in there and you're deciding out of them 2 you can't pick Marsh.

 

[typicalfan]

Well I'd pick the 3 more likely to score a 100. So I'd go with Marsh over Watto.

 

[Bazal]

He is not irrelevant at all. Competent selectors would not leave Watson out of a team Marsh is in. They're both top 6 players. If you have other players in there and you're deciding out of them 2 you can't pick Marsh.

You're a plank.

 

[Twatface Magee]

As bad as Marsh has been he still shits all over Twatto.

 

[BunniesMan]

100 times?

Maybe I am being too kind to Marsh. 1000. 10000 maybe. Watson has a very good 1st class career, his average as an opener is higher than Rogers. He is a handy bowler. At times in Brisbane he was our best after Hazlewood.

On the other hand you have Marsh who has less 1st class 100s than seasons played in his career. Averaging 36 at 1st class cricket, he isn't even good enough at the level below let alone this level.

 

[vvvrulz]

Watson might be the worst 50 test player ever.

That's a big call, Test cricket has thrown up its fair share of dunces

 

[Pete Cash]

You could put a sack of straw with a bat glued to it and it would be less of a liability than Watto at 3.

 

[Pete Cash]

I can tolerate Watson in the side at 6 I cannot tolerate him at 3. Marsh sucks too but at least he isn't going to the press basically demanding he bats in the top 3 so he can try and clobber the hard ball.