Disagree. At last count Melbourne had 8 Internationals & 2 SOO players in their starting 13. How many other teams have that? They have been overly strong in playing strength for about 5 years and all the stars have recently signed long term contracts. Isn't the salary cap designed to stop this happening? For some reason the salary cap doesn't affect the Storms playing roster, like it does other teams.
Before Storm entered the comp it was considered unfair that the Broncos had easy access to virtually all the young playing talent in QLD. Melbourne have changed that by being able to recruit the best young players from QLD over the last 6-7 years. How? These young players weren't prepared to cross the border to NSW but are now happy to move to Victoria? Obviously additional incentives are available to entice these young players, but a salary cap also applies to U20's to prevent stockpiling of young players. Once again, the U20 salary cap doesn't seem to stop the Storm.
I am lead to believe the corporate support for the Storm is comparable to a lot of the NSW clubs, yet they still make a loss of between $5-$6million per year. Can you imagine the losses they would have if they weren't succesful?
Everything points towards them spending more on players than other clubs, that's not a level playing field, and these accusations will continue as long as their owner continues to run the competition they play in.