moltz staying

[Dragons01]

Why do you think there has to be lies? Isn't it really that the tigers supposedly said they would relese Tim but then changed their mind ? Is that a lie ? Is it dishonest ?

So that sits okay with you that the Tigers give the okay or verbal that they are letting Moltzen go and then after he signs with another club they change their mind and decide 3 months later to play hard ball?

I don't care which way you look at it, it makes absolutely no sense that Humphreys would let the Tigers players, coach and everyone else believe Moltzen was gone and not say anything. Moltzen even said himself he bawled his eyes out after the semi loss because he thought he would not be at the Tigers anymore. So even at that late point Moltzen thought he was gone and Humphreys just let him keep thinking that.

 

[andrew9148]

So that sits okay with you that the Tigers give the okay or verbal that they are letting Moltzen go and then after he signs with another club they change their mind and decide 3 months later to play hard ball?

I don't care which way you look at it, it makes absolutely no sense that Humphreys would let the Tigers players, coach and everyone else believe Moltzen was gone and not say anything. Moltzen even said himself he bawled his eyes out after the semi loss because he thought he would not be at the Tigers anymore. So even at that late point Moltzen thought he was gone and Humphreys just let him keep thinking that.

I agree with your second paragraph. What you say in the first paragraph has been covered already.

 

[innsaneink]

Doesnt sit OK with me & many others.

 

[Tiger05]

Doesnt sit OK with me & many others.

Ink - us true supporters want the Moltz at the tigers. We want his passion and commitment.

The Scott Prince type players are the ones we don't want.

 

[dragondad]

I can see that there are 29 pages on this thread. It is basically Tigers' supporters justifying what has happened because they want their player to stay. On the other hand, Saints' supporters think that everything changed after the Robert Lui 'incident' and what has been done is unethical. I really feel that, if Tigers' fans were totally truthful, they would see that the West Tigers have morally done the wrong thing. No-one wants to see their favourite players leave but when decisions are made, we all have to accept the situation. Smith to the Sharks, Costigan to Newcastle, Boyd to Newcastle, Josh Morris to Canterbury. The list never stops. Sad but it's reality.

 

[innsaneink]

Ink - us true supporters want the Moltz at the tigers. We want his passion and commitment.

The Scott Prince type players are the ones we don't want.

I'd forgotten all about you trollboy...youre forgettable

 

[andrew9148]

I can see that there are 29 pages on this thread. It is basically Tigers' supporters justifying what has happened because they want their player to stay. On the other hand, Saints' supporters think that everything changed after the Robert Lui 'incident' and what has been done is unethical. I really feel that, if Tigers' fans were totally truthful, they would see that the West Tigers have morally done the wrong thing. No-one wants to see their favourite players leave but when decisions are made, we all have to accept the situation. Smith to the Sharks, Costigan to Newcastle, Boyd to Newcastle, Josh Morris to Canterbury. The list never stops. Sad but it's reality.

There would be no issue if sr George weren't acting like homos . They should have enough pride to say if you don't want us we don't want you.

 

[dragondad]

Is that what you would call an intelligent response? There must be some Wests Tigers supporters who can actually have a reasonable footie discussion.

 

[andrew9148]

Is that what you would call an intelligent response? There must be some Wests Tigers supporters who can actually have a reasonable footie discussion.

Ok given you are asking tigers supporters to be truthful, do you agree that this mess was caused by st George prematurely announcing the signing? That st George are incompetent in that they don't even know which players they can sign?

 

[851]

Is that what you would call an intelligent response? There must be some Wests Tigers supporters who can actually have a reasonable footie discussion.

I am a WestsTigers supporter,and I think he should be made head to the Dragons,no questions asked,you signed you go,all this media hype over Moltzen is a real bad look for our club,and a player who only had a couple of good games all year,I don't get the fuss.

 

[andrew9148]

I am a WestsTigers supporter,and I think he should be made head to the Dragons,no questions asked,you signed you go,all this media hype over Moltzen is a real bad look for our club,and a player who only had a couple of good games all year,I don't get the fuss.

So rugby league players are like Slaves ? He should be forced to play?

 

[Fordy20]

I can see that there are 29 pages on this thread. It is basically Tigers' supporters justifying what has happened because they want their player to stay. On the other hand, Saints' supporters think that everything changed after the Robert Lui 'incident' and what has been done is unethical. I really feel that, if Tigers' fans were totally truthful, they would see that the West Tigers have morally done the wrong thing. No-one wants to see their favourite players leave but when decisions are made, we all have to accept the situation. Smith to the Sharks, Costigan to Newcastle, Boyd to Newcastle, Josh Morris to Canterbury. The list never stops. Sad but it's reality.

This is massive oversimplication which highlights the typical cherry picking that Dragons fans are renown for. There are a number of Tigers fans who are deeply disappointed about the fact that Moltzen may not be made to honour his contract with the Dragons, yet I have not seen a single Dragons fan come forward and say "Hey our administration acted poorly and unprofessionally in this situation and we've got no one to blame but them."

 

[Bang]

So rugby league players are like Slaves ? He should be forced to play?

Geez slaves are well paid these days. They must have a good union.
Slaves didn't sign contracts and no one is going to force him to play. But if this works out in favour of the Dragons he might not be able to play Rugby League anymore.

 

[Tiger05]

There would be no issue if sr George weren't acting like homos . They should have enough pride to say if you don't want us we don't want you.

Yep.

 

[andrew9148]

Geez slaves are well paid these days. They must have a good union.
Slaves didn't sign contracts and no one is going to force him to play. But if this works out in favour of the Dragons he might not be able to play Rugby League anymore.

The most ridiculous thing posted here and that is saying something

 

[851]

So rugby league players are like Slaves ? He should be forced to play?

How is that like a slave,no one whipped him into signing the contract,if he didn't want to sign he should have not signed,he was contracted to us for next year so he was staying anyway.
Moltzen made the call,he should live with it,all this poor bloke stuff really urks me,for christ sake he is a grown man,he should be able to stand up for himself and be accountable for his actions,he said he was leaving,so he should leave.

 

[meltiger]

I can see that there are 29 pages on this thread. It is basically Tigers' supporters justifying what has happened because they want their player to stay. On the other hand, Saints' supporters think that everything changed after the Robert Lui 'incident' and what has been done is unethical. I really feel that, if Tigers' fans were totally truthful, they would see that the West Tigers have morally done the wrong thing. No-one wants to see their favourite players leave but when decisions are made, we all have to accept the situation. Smith to the Sharks, Costigan to Newcastle, Boyd to Newcastle, Josh Morris to Canterbury. The list never stops. Sad but it's reality.

Morally. ha ha good one.

We running professional clubs or a chook raffle?

The word moral doesn't come into it, and Schubert certainly won't rule, either way, on the basis of morals.

The thread has gone 29 pages due to a fantastic trolling effort by some ST George fans. No other reason.

 

[hybrid_tiger]

How is that like a slave,no one whipped him into signing the contract,if he didn't want to sign he should have not signed,he was contracted to us for next year so he was staying anyway.
Moltzen made the call,he should live with it,all this poor bloke stuff really urks me,for christ sake he is a grown man,he should be able to stand up for himself and be accountable for his actions,he said he was leaving,so he should leave.

Spot on.

He's an unethical sook with no backbone, I don't want him.

 

[Guvner]

What does that even mean ?

Taub cannot be responsible for something he can't control ie the tigers releasing molt. You are geniused. You can only be responsible for things you can control.

If the tigers told taub they would release Tim and he told st George that what did he do wrong ?

As far ad taub knew they were going to release hi
.

Without question the dumbest person on this board. Taking stupidity to new heights.

Oh dear. Its Taubers job to acquire the release from the Tigers. It is Taubers job to make sure that is in place before allowing his client to sign elsewhere. Its Taubers job not to tell us it is in hand when clearly it isnt and never was.

Your posting on this issue renders the bolded virtually impossible.

 

[Guvner]

Spot on.

He's an unethical sook with no backbone, I don't want him.

I hear ya, but you are going to have him.