And lol League_God...you're hating on him because he's not going to win a CC medal? LMAO. Talk about impossible standards. Guess what? None of our squad are going to win one. And sorry but at 23 if Roberts hasn't shown any evidence of decent kicking or passing game he's not going to. People always excuse him and attack Mullen because he's older but Roberts has been in firstgrade since 2011 and can't even pass and kick without f**king up. The games when Roberts "steps up" are fewer and farer in between than Mullen. They're both inconsistent (although Mullen has shown a long period of consistent good footy before injury got him) but Mullen offers the squad so much more than Roberts it's not funny. It boggles the mind that anyone would see it otherwise.
I am not calling Mullen a dud far from it but it is time to accept he is not going to be as good as we all thought he would be & should not be immune from criticism of his performances is all i am saying.
When Mullen first burst on the scene as a 17 year old, many (including myself) were thinking he'd go on to be a mainstay in the NSW and Australian side. I believe that people who harboured this belief had sufficient reason to believe this to be an accurate prediction.
Nowadays, he'll be lucky to ever see rep footy (beyond city vs country) ever again.
He'll never play for Aus that's for sure.
Is that hating on him? To me that seems to just be an accurate observation of the development of his career.
Mullen is arguably the best defensive half in the game, has a great long-kicking game (although not this year) and has many other attributes that make him a very good first grader.
If you look at my previous post I actually state that Mullen at his best is very good. Unfortunately we just don't see it enough... especially when we need his best.
Additionally to imply that we haven't seen any evidence of a good kicking or passing game from Roberts is wrong if not slightly delusional. At this stage, I don't think anyone would say Roberts provides more to the team than Mullen. However, I think it's plausible to argue that it's
possible that one day he will from a value-for-money view.
Also, speaking conservatively I still believe Gagai, Scott, Smith are just a few from the team who are more than capable of winning a clive churchill medal as ALL of them have stood up in big games more consistently than Mullen.
Regardless, it sure would help our cause if we had a half in the side who is capable of winning a CM.
Also, what Tom says.