Gidley is best at fullback, but I think Boyd is better, particularly at playing Bennett-ball.I've always thought Gidley was best @ fullback & that's when Newcastle looked most dangerous; I think his rubbish in the halve's & he wouldn't have got injured if he was @ fullback.
you could be right, but here's the thing... if Bennett can't make US into "another club" so to speak, then we're f**ked anyway.Mullen plays like he's got the weight of the world on his shoulders. There's no doubt he's got the talent but his head is just not in the right place. For his own benefit I think he would be better off at another club.
Who do u support Mongoose?
Raiders
not here to troll though, im not a mullen hater
ok...lets say 280k a year then...break it in the middle somewhere.The question i ask myself is for that money AND experience if i was his employer....would i sack him or those around him?
Why have I never once seen one of these threads after we've had a win, or when we're playing good football?
Exactly, he can't think quickly enough, and doesn't have vision, hence the lack of variety in his play, and poor decision making. IMO he's not a half. People have been making excuses for him for years, but to date nothing has changed.Mullen can't and will never be able to play under pressure. The most accurate excuse for the lack of dominance in the last how many years.
The question i ask myself is for that money AND experience if i was his employer....would i sack him or those around him?