The Problem there Colonel is yes know one knows anything about the process, which would to me seem a little secretive, or at least the possibility of secretive. The Current boards spokes person during the election said they would be open and transparent. Well it appears they have failed if no one knows the process as you say.
and ypou would be satisfied with an ad in the paper for this? If so, as I have said, that could well be tokensim
Or would you prefer them to publicly name all the candidates they have considered, the interview panel and the questions asked?
But surely Mark, we don't need to, or even have the right to, know everything that is going on in the boardroom?
A new board has been voted in, by a massive majority I might add. I'm sure most people would be content in letting them make the decisions for now.
Suity
Most people seem happy that they are considering Osbourne for the position - but would have liked to have seen an ad in the paper.
Which, if they've got their eyes on a person, is 1. a waste of money and 2. a waste of time for possible applicants.
Personally, I'm satisfied that they appear to have nabbed someone with very good credentials both inside and outside of football, and that they have had a shortlist and seem to have conducted interviews.
There was some concern from people prior to the elections we'd be seeing jobs for the boys and Leabeater et al would suddenly get jobs. First test of a job that has come up and I think, if it goes to Osbourne, we can rule out jobs for the boys.
