The Great Dane
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,971
It's not bad, but would have liked to see one made for the ACT as well , we always seem to be forgotten in stuff like this.
reckon they'll go for a sponsor chucked on top. Similar to this:
Or they could do what they did in 2001 and chuck a sponsors badge on top of the new NRL badge:
it's not bad, but would have liked to see one made for the act as well , we always seem to be forgotten in stuff like this.
Um, there is no such thing as the ACTRL. That's why.
Correct me if Im'm wrong but Tasmania, SA etc have their own Rugby League organisations who run their competitions. The Canberra competition falls under the CRL and they wear a CRL logo on the jersey
As I stated before that's all on paper. The Canberra Raiders pretty much run the local league and no Canberran junior clubs do not wear the CRL logo.
Just wondering do the Yass Magpies (or is Cowra the Magpies I can't remember) wear the CRL logo, because I know the Queanbeyan roos and Blues and the Coma Colts all wear the Canberra region RL logo.still think there should be one, even if it's just a symbolic logo. seems strange to have every state and territory(including modifing the NRL logo for NZ) but not cater to the ACT.
As I stated before that's all on paper. The Canberra Raiders pretty much run the local league and no Canberran junior clubs do not wear the CRL logo.
Breathe.
It'll be OK.
So by your logic, teams should not wear the logo of a body they aren't administered by. Therefore they shouldn't be wearing a CRL or ACTRL logo but a Raiders logo.
Just wondering do the Yass Magpies (or is Cowra the Magpies I can't remember) wear the CRL logo, because I know the Queanbeyan roos and Blues and the Coma Colts all wear the Canberra region RL logo.