Yes always better to move on when your position is indefensible.
All he was saying was there's a difference between the knowledge of of something at an academic and institution level and it being at the forefront of the general public's concious.
It's been known about for possibly 2 decades, the legal ramifications possibly 1 but it's only been common knowledge for a few years.
Even today probably 1 in 3 people aren't aware.
The average mum isn't into sport and that just wouldn't a topic they're well versed on.
Rugby league has always been a hard sell for over protective parents because ... its Rugby League!
When I played as a kid, nobody really got concussed. The force required for a concussion isn't prevalent at a young age and it would be interesting to see the difference percentage wize of concussion in kids playing compared with adults.
Moving forward Rugby League has wonderful alternatives in touch and tag. The most notable being Benji Marshall who transitioned to full contact at a late age.
For all the talk about Contact sports in decline, going to Basketball and Soccer. I think you find the drop off in League coincides with an uptake in Tag and Touch. Which really means league has lost nothing , perhaps even gained participation.
The main part about participation too is that those who played at a young age are usually fans for life.
We don't need big participation to get the best talent, as this situation unfolds. It seems those who possess those talents aren't lost to the sport .given the fantastic product we have today is testament to that.
Union, that dreadful pile of rubbish doesn't have an alternative..and the loss in participation is just purely a loss. This coincides will the aging demographic of Union fans.