Iamback
Referee
- Messages
- 20,282
Not if they get nrl
They currently on have $400m in revenue, That need to bring in the NRL rights cost in finance.
Who is loaning them that?
Not if they get nrl
Well I could see Fox doing a deal as an extension of their US rights to still cover parts of NFL, MLB and Nascar. But without an overseas daddy or more NRL/AFL rights, Stan will be a tough spot.
Nine networkThey currently on have $400m in revenue, That need to bring in the NRL rights cost in finance.
Who is loaning them that?
Nine network
My combination would be NRL, Big Bash, ODIs, NBA and a part EPL package of 4-5 big teams. Obviously plus a few other sports. You can make that sustainable.Not if they get nrl
They bid 500 million for the aflTheir revenue fell 38%
Ch7's halved.
Fox has a rich daddy to help, Hopefully Vegas gets interest for overseas providers
They bid 500 million for the afl
to get it from fox they would have to pay something ridiculous like 450 million pa(Stan only)
And you can’t just look at exisiting revenue to determine affordability
mew subscribers and sponsors will come from the nrl
My combination would be NRL, Big Bash, ODIs, NBA and a part EPL package of 4-5 big teams. Obviously plus a few other sports. You can make that sustainable.
The nrl would be the content to build the network onNot for NRL alone though
The nrl would be the content to build the network on
without nrl fox will lose 70 percent of its subscribers
How do they build a network otherwise lmaoThis is going around in circles.
Look at Kayo's churn rate in NRL off season, That is with cricket, NFL, NBA etc to go with.
You have less TV content, No sport so you'd have 6 months where the subs drop off.
That doesn't stack up $ wise
How do they build a network otherwise lmao
rugby league provides the halo effect
How did foxtel build up their business ?
Why did stan and nine bid 500 million for all the aflFor them to build their business enough they need the new owners of Paramount to shut up shop here and let them have the content again.
Remember Stan used to have their stuff and Disney's stuff. They have also lost the Peacock deal.
Foxtel built theirs up from being the only Pay TV company, Now there are just too many so content is everywhere
You tell us. You are the afl expert. Gil’s love child.If ts contra not cash that’s an outstanding result for afl! Imagine being able to include it in memberships at no cost. Why the f**k hasn’t nrl got that deal?
“while Nine Entertainment owns the free-to-air games, and wants more, particularly for its Stan Sport platform. “The executives making the NRL Vegas trip for a schmoozefest
Nine sends one executive to the NRL’s US venture, but Foxtel sends a crowd; John Singleton drops into SPASM’s home; Allan Gray’s letter to Southern Cross.www.afr.com
Doesn't say too much that isn't already covered by current discussions. But seems to suggest a bearish environment approaching to negotiate TV rights for NRL.
Ever notice how PR always praises the fumblers and always runs down PVL and the NRL? There’s a lot of hate and negative energy in that boy.“while Nine Entertainment owns the free-to-air games, and wants more, particularly for its Stan Sport platform. “
Therein lies the key to a massive tv deal
Pay tv will need to be around 400 million pa
fta won’t provide much of an increase
AFR is owned by nine. Just more bullshit mind games they’re trying to play.The executives making the NRL Vegas trip for a schmoozefest
Nine sends one executive to the NRL’s US venture, but Foxtel sends a crowd; John Singleton drops into SPASM’s home; Allan Gray’s letter to Southern Cross.www.afr.com
Doesn't say too much that isn't already covered by current discussions. But seems to suggest a bearish environment approaching to negotiate TV rights for NRL.
Because we're sht at negotiating tv deals maybe?You tell us. You are the afl expert. Gil’s love child.