Yep they’d have to get rid of the rule so the rlpa would have to agreeNot sure you can with the 5 turn around rule. Any team playing Monday could only play Sat- Sun the next week
Yep they’d have to get rid of the rule so the rlpa would have to agreeNot sure you can with the 5 turn around rule. Any team playing Monday could only play Sat- Sun the next week
Yep they’d have to get rid of the rule so the rlpa would have to agree
There was even a proposal of 4 x 25 minute quarters way backEither way still 2 good TV timeslots free. Perfect for the 9th game
There was even a proposal of 4 x 25 minute quarters way back
if they did that and it worked the tv rights would dwarf afl
Not excluding them in the overall picture, it is after all the only positive part of the new deal! But like I said if we are talking about how Australian Tv values NRL v AFL then we need to compare equally.NZ are part of the comp.. Of course you exclude them in your rant.
Maybe it hasn't but certain things have changed in that time to make the game better and the improved ratings on Kayo are a by product of it.
Sometimes the exposure is better than the cash
Yep Monday night throws all sorts of scheduling issues for turn around times and will be another blight on clubs being able to earn decent revenue from fans and corporates. Unless FTA is going to pay silly money its certain to be a Sunday 6pm slot.I think the 6pm Sunday is the time to go to. still early enough to be over on a school night and causes less hassel with the draw
Advertising makes little difference to Fox, only FTA. FTA are now the minor partner and getting smaller day by day, I wouldn't be changing the fabric of the game to pander to a dying medium.There was even a proposal of 4 x 25 minute quarters way back
if they did that and it worked the tv rights would dwarf afl
Poor quality trollingNot excluding them in the overall picture, it is after all the only positive part of the new deal! But like I said if we are talking about how Australian Tv values NRL v AFL then we need to compare equally.
NRL needs to take its current $370mill Fox/Ch9 deal to around $420mill a year from 28- for it to show any decent growth after a decade of staying the same and with expansion genuinely being paid for. At the moment bringing in team 17 has COST the game around $16 mill a year due to Vlandys failure to secure a bigger deal for the extra content from Fox/Ch9.
Yep fox has less adds than channel nine lolAdvertising makes little difference to Fox, only FTA. FTA are now the minor partner and getting smaller day by day, I wouldn't be changing the fabric of the game to pander to a dying medium.
I'm comparing how Australian TV values NRL and AFL. Simple as that.Poor quality trolling
the nrl has a team in nz
it’s not their fault nobody wants an afl team outside Australia
your basically happy to compare 15 nrl clubs to 18 afl clubs
Not excluding them in the overall picture, it is after all the only positive part of the new deal! But like I said if we are talking about how Australian Tv values NRL v AFL then we need to compare equally.
NRL needs to take its current $370mill Fox/Ch9 deal to around $420mill a year from 28- for it to show any decent growth after a decade of staying the same and with expansion genuinely being paid for. At the moment bringing in team 17 has COST the game around $16 mill a year due to Vlandys failure to secure a bigger deal for the extra content from Fox/Ch9.
Ok since we’re making stupid argumentsI'm comparing how Australian TV values NRL and AFL. Simple as that.
In '23 and '24 that values is $370mill v $476mill. That's a heck of a gap to close in the '28 deal, especially if they realize anything like the news reports for 25-. Would need us to add some serious value to the deal, or hopefully some genuine competitive tension for that to happen.
Not just shown on fta getting great ratings in nsw and qldLets compare the 2.
10 years ago. AFL was played in every state on FTA Live. Besides the 2 new teams there has been no change
10 years ago.
We had the RL farce of the 2 Friday night games in different states. Making the 2nd game much less valuable because of the spoilers. You had Mel, Adelaide and Perth rarely starting the coverage before midnight.
Since then FTA has lost exclusivity to it's games. Stan. Netflix etc has made the ratings for even the big games drop.
So the FTA value has dropped.
As for Fox. You had 5 games of the 8 on the platform.
You also had the NRL streaming games on the website.
That ending and Kayo starting has seen a surge in ratings but you haven't had a proper season since. So was hard to justify more from them
That sounds just like Vlandys negotiating tactic lol.Lets compare the 2.
10 years ago. AFL was played in every state on FTA Live. Besides the 2 new teams there has been no change
10 years ago.
We had the RL farce of the 2 Friday night games in different states. Making the 2nd game much less valuable because of the spoilers. You had Mel, Adelaide and Perth rarely starting the coverage before midnight.
Since then FTA has lost exclusivity to it's games. Stan. Netflix etc has made the ratings for even the big games drop.
So the FTA value has dropped.
As for Fox. You had 5 games of the 8 on the platform.
You also had the NRL streaming games on the website.
That ending and Kayo starting has seen a surge in ratings but you haven't had a proper season since. So was hard to justify more from them
no it doesnt. It has traditionally valued it at $20mill and from next year at $32mill. Yep it isnt interested in AFL. Win for NRL!Ok since we’re making stupid arguments
nz tv values the nrl at 70 million pa
It values the afl at zero pa
the afl really need to get more money from nz
It’s bad quality trollingno it doesnt. It has traditionally valued it at $20mill and from next year at $32mill. Yep it isnt interested in AFL. Win for NRL!
?That sounds just like Vlandys negotiating tactic lol.
Fox you want to pay $100mill less and get some covid cuts, despite us shutting down telstra streaming and shutting down our media content? Sure thing
Ch9 you want to pay the same in 2027 as you did in 2017 and have covid cuts? Sure why not, lets not worry about inflation and extra content of a 17th team in Brisbane, which you've being crying out for for years.
Hopefully he isnt left to his own devices again to negotiate the 2028 contract!
and? When talking about what Australian tv pays for each code there is no relevance to what NZ tv pays.It’s bad quality trolling
nrl has a team in nz
so we compare our tv deals to theirs
stop thinking like a fumbler
Arguably opportunity for better with introduction of Brisbane2. They still have 3 FTA games a week in same time slots but from next year could boost Qlnd audiences with Brisbane2. And for that we got $5mill contra lolSo where what were the ratings on NRL.com? How can you know what the ratings will be to get more from fox? You can only do what the data says at the time
Again is ch9 getting the same content as in 2017?