What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Next TV rights deal

Status
Not open for further replies.

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,456
THE PRICE IS RIGHT

I can exclusively reveal that Channel Nine will keep the rights to rugby league, again. The NRL knows it can get about $2 billion out of the next deal, but we're hearing current rights holder Nine wants a deal done sooner than later, and will push for it to be signed off before the end of the year – despite the fact Ten shareholders James Packer and Lachlan Murdoch have already approached the NRL. If Ten were to win the rights, wouldn't there be a conflict of interest with Packer also being half owner of South Sydney?

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...for-the-nrl-season-ahead-20150302-13si2s.html

I'm sure this is mostly tongue and cheek, but Webster has a short memory, Gygell is a member of the Roosters chairman's club and lachlan owns the Broncos!
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
I'm sure this is mostly tongue and cheek, but Webster has a short memory, Gygell is a member of the Roosters chairman's club and lachlan owns the Broncos!

all his other predictions in that article aren't tongue in cheek so maybe he's being for real

i have no idea where the journos have plucked $2 illion from as it's been said a few times

the only one who gave a reason for it was whoever wrote it would be Packer wanting to get back at Gyngell

still even that doesn't make a lot of sense seeing Ten may be sold off to News Corp
 

Hello, I'm The Doctor

First Grade
Messages
9,124
With the introduction of the NRL app and given the F&L rights are gone (so the NRL can make demands regarding times, production/commentary quality, etc.) i dont mind 9 getting the rights again.

I hope 10 is at least given the opportunity, if only to hear them out and scare 9 a bit. But im not as against 9 holding the rights as i was during the last negotiation period.

(And if 10 are desperate, we could give them the state leagues for a bit of publicity)
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,456
all his other predictions in that article aren't tongue in cheek so maybe he's being for real

i have no idea where the journos have plucked $2 illion from as it's been said a few times

the only one who gave a reason for it was whoever wrote it would be Packer wanting to get back at Gyngell

still even that doesn't make a lot of sense seeing Ten may be sold off to News Corp

The bit about a new deal being done by end of the year is very unlikely considering the expansion review won't be concluded until this time next year.
 

Rodney

Juniors
Messages
243
The rise of the pound against the australian dollar will be making ESL salaries quite attractive once more, so I wouldn't go writing it off as a feeder comp just yet.

Its now OVER half of the NRL cap!

The ESL is going to feed the NRL for at least the next decade unless there are radical revisions on the ESL cap policy.
NRL clubs are able to negotiate with a rising cap in mind and more space year on year, ESL clubs are on sinking ground regarding negotiation position.
The relative value of players has shifted up and there is no mechanism to deal with it.

And its not just like RU pinching a couple wingers and centres, the NRL can use EVERY player.
 

BuffaloRules

Coach
Messages
15,444
Surely there will be at least 1 more game on Free To Air when the next TV deal is done?

It's criminal that there are no games on Sat night..

This alone will add lots of value... Have 10 show a game on Sat night...

Make Fox pay through the nose if they want to keep Monday night ( I wouldn't mind seeing that go to FTA as well...)
 
Messages
15,658
Surely there will be at least 1 more game on Free To Air when the next TV deal is done?

It's criminal that there are no games on Sat night..

This alone will add lots of value... Have 10 show a game on Sat night...

Make Fox pay through the nose if they want to keep Monday night ( I wouldn't mind seeing that go to FTA as well...)

Would love for10 to get the mon night game .
 

mongoose

Coach
Messages
11,805
Surely there will be at least 1 more game on Free To Air when the next TV deal is done?

It's criminal that there are no games on Sat night..

This alone will add lots of value... Have 10 show a game on Sat night...

Make Fox pay through the nose if they want to keep Monday night ( I wouldn't mind seeing that go to FTA as well...)

that would be good.

Let 9 have their Broncos and Rabbitohs Friday nights and the sunday sydney derby. Give 10 a sat night and mon night game.
 

jc155776

Coach
Messages
13,686
What a bunch of useless merkins.

Can't even get Friday night football live into Qld let alone deliver these pipe dreams.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...in-next-tv-neglotiations-20150306-13x0kx.html

Why the NRL and AFL are looking at $2 billion deals in next TV neglotiations

Date
March 6, 2015 - 10:00PM

Roy Masters
Rugby League Columnist

A $2 billion broadcast rights deal is within reach of both the NRL and AFL, provided they follow the lead of cricket, says Australia's leading expert on sports media rights.

Colin Smith, the managing director of Global Media and Sports, says this bonanza is conditional on both codes embracing change in 2015, ahead of the expiration of the AFL's current contract next year and the NRL's in 2017.

"2015 is the critical decision year for the future of the two dominant football leagues in Australia," Smith said.

"Cricket Australia has been the broadcast innovator building for the Australian team in Tests and ODI. Cricket Australia's T20 Big Bash League broadcast on Channel Ten has been very successful indeed with significant attendances and large TV audiences.

"I wouldn't have said that five years ago.

"[Cricket Australia CEO] James Sutherland has been the great innovator. To run the Big Bash concurrent with the India Tests and get good numbers on both, shows how strong it is.

"They will double their rights fees for Big Bash next time and Channel Ten will make money."

Live professional sport is a must have for free-to-air and pay TV broadcasters. Channel Ten's financial decline can be traced directly to the network losing AFL.

Four years ago, I interviewed Smith when he was advising the leading Australian sports on the detailed evaluation of the business case for their media rights.

He said: "Since that time, the media landscape has undergone further rapid revolutionary change with multiple access viewing platforms from FTA and pay TV and increasingly online using different devices - TVs, PCs, smartphones and tablets.

"These revolutionary changes have resulted in the increasing fragmentation of audiences across multiple channels and online portals.

"The only constant, globally, is that leading live TV sport, such as the NRL and AFL in Australia, soccer in the UK and Europe, or NFL in the US, continues to be the driver of very large TV audiences.

"Unequivocally, the NRL, AFL and cricket are the absolute must-carry sports for the commercial channels and Foxtel in Australia."

But Smith points out that sports fans who are not near a TV still want to watch live sport on an "anytime, anywhere" basis.

Furthermore, they are increasingly dual screening, using their smartphone and/or tablet for apps and connecting with their sports friends on social media (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram).

Major sports will profit from the sale of these online rights, while broadcasters will seek to link them up with their TV coverage.

Australia's anti-siphoning laws mean that major sports must be offered to free-to-air TV first.

Smith argues that this legislation, together with the rising volume of online traffic, offers opportunities to new players, such as Stan, the joint venture between Channel Nine and Fairfax Media.

"There definitely are potential changes looming on the horizon that could ultimately be attracted to the AFL and the NRL," he said.

"Stan is one; Presto, the joint-venture between Channel Seven and Foxtel is another. Fetch TV, Apple TV and Google/YouTube could also bid.

"The big one is Netflix, a huge $US20 billion corporation. One third of all the volume on internet protocol in the US is Netflix.

"They could acquire the rights to both AFL and NRL in partnership with a free-to-air network and take these sports off the pay TV platform."

Smith, therefore, disagrees with News Corp's CFO Bedi Singh, who told a conference in San Francisco this week that he does not foresee Foxtel being caught up in the same bidding war in Britain that produced a record £5.136 billion quad play involving TV, mobile phones, broadband and telephony for live English Premier League matches.

Fox Sports, owned by News Corp, presently holds the pay TV rights to NRL and AFL.

"I don't think we are looking at getting into negotiations where you see the kind of stuff that's happening in the UK, hopefully," Singh said.

Apart from the online challenges from the new players, Singh has presumably not heard of the AFL's advanced plans to produce some of their own matches and stream them live to fans. With former News Ltd boss Kim Williams now an AFL commissioner, it represents an open challenge to Fox Sports to pay more than its share of the $1.25 billion the code currently receives.

The AFL has a media staff of 120 working on this project.

The NRL receives about the same as the AFL, when rights fees from New Zealand are added but, with potential audiences in Britain and New Zealand, would prefer to link up with a broadcaster with international ties, rather than produce games in-house.

Smith said: "A $2 billion deal is eminently achievable for both NRL and AFL."

Path to profits: Colin Smith's seven-point plan for the NRL to seal a $2 billion bonanza:

"All games need to be live on TV, with opportunities for broadcasters to have more advertising. Swapping the Friday night games, where Brisbane sees a Queensland team at the same time as NSW sees a Sydney game and then flip the two games, works."
"An additional team in south-east Queensland: either a new team or a relocated team from Sydney. The NRL must add another Queensland team to the Broncos, Cowboys and Titans to expand their TV programming options. Queenslanders love watching Queensland clubs. A second team playing out of Suncorp Stadium would give Nine and Foxtel the chance to gather more audience from Queensland."
"The successful Auckland Nines must be the season kick-off for the NRL."
"Build a World Club Championship of up to four teams between England and Australia." In the same way the ARU gained a financial bonus from Britain paying a fourfold increase for SANZAR rights, any added exposure of NRL in England will add value.
"Develop a specific window for an annual Tri-Nations between Australia, New Zealand and England."
"Protect and grow the game in Melbourne, if only to enhance the ultra premium product, State of Origin."
"Ensure there are annually NRL games in Perth, Adelaide, Wellington and possibly Port Moresby and Wollongong, Cairns and Rockhampton."
 

Starkers

Bench
Messages
3,148
$2b is a pretty chunky deal for both codes. Most of Colin Smiths ideas in those last few sentences seem to be common sense and views held by Shane Richardson. $400m a year with an 18 team come is about $22.2m per club per season. Round it down to $20m and that is an enormous salary cap with cash to spare plus the non-TV revenue which seems to be growing. If that happens all talk of players jumping to France or Japan rugby union will disappear.
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,456
$2b is a pretty chunky deal for both codes. Most of Colin Smiths ideas in those last few sentences seem to be common sense and views held by Shane Richardson. $400m a year with an 18 team come is about $22.2m per club per season. Round it down to $20m and that is an enormous salary cap with cash to spare plus the non-TV revenue which seems to be growing. If that happens all talk of players jumping to France or Japan rugby union will disappear.

clubs only account for less than 50% of broadcast revenue now, can't see that doubling, it will probably stay the same and the cap gradually rise to 10m, but your point still stands, players won't be leaving for more money.
 

Haynzy

First Grade
Messages
8,613
email the NRL and ask why it's not live on Gem as guaranteed by the current broadcast rights agreement.

A whole bunch of us have been doing that since halfway through last year.
All we get is, "We're working hard to resolve this with Channel 9"

They don't really care because it means we all buy the digital pass.
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,456
A whole bunch of us have been doing that since halfway through last year.
All we get is, "We're working hard to resolve this with Channel 9"

They don't really care because it means we all buy the digital pass.

ridiculous, they have a contract so obviously the NRL have given it up for something.
 

FlameThrower

Bench
Messages
3,557
ridiculous, they have a contract so obviously the NRL have given it up for something.

So at most times on FTA or pay TV u can view some type of "live" game/sport from just about anywhere in the world / yet right here in our own backyard u have the "local" viewers subjected to 1am delayed telecast of a local sport!! !! What a joke ch9 and NRL are about seriously trying to grow the game nationally!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top