To be honest you`re a bit sad mate with your continual half glass empty attitude in the guise of `telling it how it is`.
You can go f**k yourself with such nonsense.
If you want to live in an ivory tower in Sydney and pretend everything is hunky-dory that is your business, but trying to bully others out of airing criticism doesn't make that criticism illegitimate or make it go away.
I read an interview with the Panthers CEO the other day and he said it is becoming obvious to them that the younger generation have nowhere near the attraction to pokies that the older generation has. He said Panthers Group are preparing for a time coming soon when pokie revenue will make a much smaller part of their revenue. They are basically looking to diversify their income streams.
So the Panthers are going to invest in revenue streams other than pokies (odds are other forms of gambling...), what of it?
That doesn't change the fact that the NRL's priority should be it's sports and entertainment business, and that it's success should be measured against that. The fact that the Panthers, and other clubs, are so reliant on other forms of income to support themselves shows that something is very, very, wrong with either the NRL's or the club's business plans.
My definition of success - winning or nearly winning comp`s.
Then you're a bigger moron than I thought. It was obvious that I was talking about commercial success, and not success on the field.
The Dolphins could win the comp next season and then promptly got broke the one after, would that make them successful?
The grant - that`s their share of the revenue the competition they are in generates, it`s not a Gov`t handout or charity - they`ve earned it.
Again, go f**k yourself.
To get enough funding so the grants covered the salary cap, and then some, John Grant had to take money that was earmarked for the grassroots, development, and investment, and that situation has only got worse since covid. In other words the clubs didn't earn shit, they simply used their power within the game to strong-arm resources in a classic case of the powerful taking from the weak, and the game is worse off for it.
Furthermore, the clubs wouldn't be reliant on the grant if they were successful businesses in their own right.
In a functional system the club's should be self-sustaining and making money that the NRL can then use to reinvest in the interests of whole. You know, like a normal franchising arrangement where the franchisee pays the franchisor for services and the right to use their IP, and the franchisor takes the majority of that money and reinvests it back into the business through marketing campaigns, training programs, etc.
Back to pokie revenue, it won`t last for ever, rich clubs will diversify their incomes to support the thing that the whole shebang is there to run, the thing they love, their NRL team and Rugby League club.
I agree that the clubs are only out for themselves, that's a large part of the problem.
The NRL and ARLC's mandate is to grow the game and work in the best interests of sport, not solely in the interests of the 17 professional clubs. Unfortunately that fact has been lost on most people, and that is largely responsible for RL stagnating in recent times.