Brandy's not worthy of sympathy.Warren Smith will be bitching about 1 ref every game he commentates. Poor Brandy.
Brandy's not worthy of sympathy.Warren Smith will be bitching about 1 ref every game he commentates. Poor Brandy.
Sounds good, so it probably won't be that.I'm thinking the only way it can work, someone infringes referee calls advantage and signals six again. If you pick it up and run with it the tackle count restarts, if you leave it you get a full penalty. Doesn't seem very well thought out.
I'm thinking the only way it can work, someone infringes referee calls advantage and signals six again. If you pick it up and run with it the tackle count restarts, if you leave it you get a full penalty. Doesn't seem very well thought out.
"The wrestle was the same with one referee vs two referees"
Probably need to look at play the ball speeds of Origin w/ two referees vs internationals w/ one referee.
If you think it was the same, you're not looking at it objectively.
Isn’t that how penalties work already?
You can decide to run with it and get six again (quick tap) or kick for touch.
It hasn’t improved it that much. Refs don’t penalise what they should be doing. If that means giving 25 penalties a game so be it. The bunker is worse though.
It would be better if it was 6 again if there are more than 2 defenders in the tackle. If there is more than 2 in the tackle these days it is purely for wrestling purposes.
Yes and no one calls that an asterisk premiership. People just love to adhere to the sky is falling logic.Not without precedent though.
They introduced the 10m rule half way through 1993.
There iisn't anything called a ruck penalty in the rule book
They are all play the ball infringements