Happy MEel
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,858
Did anyone hear on the Grill Team today that Hayne is considering leaving the NRL at the end of the year?
Coincidence???
Coincidence???
He only needs to have knowingly made a false statement to the cops when interviewed. He could simply have concealed the existence of evidence, stated that document X was the original and only agreement with company Y (when it wasn't), stating that the $X of cash withdrawn was used for purpose Z (when it wasn't), or otherwise obstructed knowingly obstructed the police in their attempt to investigate and prosecute a case.
Are the ATO now obliged to audit the players for the alleged cash payments?
There would be more.specific appropriate offences relating to all of those actions though I would've thought.
ATO are really small fish in this case in terms of the dollar values being thrown around. They might put onus on players to show they have included all their income and then penalise them maybe 75% plus interest. And who said the players didn't declare the income anyway (probably didn't though)?Are the ATO now obliged to audit the players for the alleged cash payments?
There would be more.specific appropriate offences relating to all of those actions though I would've thought.
I'm fairly certain that perversion of justice is used when the underlying offence is significant and/or when there is more than one act of interferenceThere are specific offences that may (or may not) be relevant here....but the difference is that these alleged acts concerned an apparent attempt to interfere with a police investigation. Yes, it is an offence to make a false declaration, but it is a more severe offence to do so in an attempt to lead the cops up the garden path.
Who knows? You're the one being evasive about your claimed reason...So what's that got to do with Nolan supposedly giving a bag cash to Norman at a car park in Ryde?? .... as far as I can see they are 2 completely different situations.
Lol.STFU.
Geez you're boring.
I'm fairly certain that perversion of justice is used when the underlying offence is significant and/or when there is more than one act of interference
If you make that or another false declaration to the people responsible for enforcing the law (or potentially to others involved in the legal system) you bring the perverting the course of justice stuff into play.
so if the nrl was a legal body the parra board could have been done for perverting the course of justice? interesting
Yeh, but they're not. I was referring to people who attempt to influence judges / politicians / jurors with direct influence over the carriage of justice.