What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Parramatta Leagues Club board sacked, administrator appointed

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,788
Surely if the stuff reported is remotely accurate, then seward is #1 target .... wasnt merchandise proceeds his field of expertise at the dogs too
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
75,110
Ping @strider

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...t-underthetable-payments-20160711-gq3et2.html


Parramatta Eels officials Jason Irvine and Scott Seward admit under-the-table payments

11 July 2016

Kate McClymont



In explosive testimony before NRL salary cap investigators, Jason Irvine and Scott Seward have admitted to what amounts to theft and fraud in an attempt to honour under-the-table deals for cash payments to Parramatta rugby league payers.

Seward, the former chief executive officer of the Eels, and Irvine, the former football manager, have admitted to the NRL that players were paid in cash, which was removed from the takings of club's merchandise sales.

"You know cash is king," Irvine told investigators of removing funds from merchandise sales before the proceeds were banked.

The pair also admitted to participating in a scheme in which two suppliers were told to inflate invoices to the club. When the club paid the invoices, one supplier returned the inflated amount by way of cash, which Irvine personally collected. Another supplier paid the money received from the inflated invoices into Irvine's credit union account.

Irvine then withdrew the cash and handed it to Scott Seward who paid cash to whichever player "was hammering him the most".

"I didn't think it was illegal," Irvine told NRL investigators in his interview with them on April 1. But he acknowledged the practice of inflating invoices to give cash payments to players was "shonky".

By the end of 2014, Irvine and Seward were desperate. Their predecessors had promised thousands and thousands of dollars in the under-the-table deals, which had been negotiated in cafés with nothing more than a shake of the hand.

"The players are like animals you know. They feed wherever they can," a frustrated Irvine complained to the NRL about players and their agents baying for their unwritten deals to be honoured.

According to his signed statement, Seward told investigators that by the end of 2014 he had to find $589,000 to honour these unwritten deals to players.

Seward's statement indicated that Peter Nolan, the then-recruitment manager, was aware of the details of most of the deals. He said that when he took over as CEO in mid 2013, he had expressed his concerns to Nolan as to how he was to find the money.

In his statement, Seward said Nolan told him not to worry because "people will help us out".

Irvine said that Seward was "under the pump really severely once" and he phoned Tony Herman, a former under 20s' coach, whose company Green Options was doing groundwork for the club.

"Mate, we need 30 grand," Irvine claims Seward told Herman.

According to tax invoices obtained by Fairfax Media in early 2015, Green Options was asked to transfer three amounts – $40,000, $32,000 and $17,490 – into Irvine's credit union account.

However, Irvine was adamant that only two of the amounts were paid into his account which he then provided in cash to Seward.

He told investigators that a mysterious transfer of $37,000 from his account to Jarryd Hayne was personal and had nothing to do with the club. Irvine was not asked where the money for the $37,000 payment to Hayne had come from.

Irvine also told investigators that his close friend, Leba Zibara, whose company supplied clothing to the club, helped out with inflated invoices.

Irvine said he went to Mr Zibara's home on the Central Coast on several occasions where he collected envelopes containing wads of cash. According to the transcript of his evidence he collected an estimated $20,000 in cash from Mr Zibara which he provided to Seward.

Irvine said he only once gave cash directly to a player and that was to former Eels hooker Nathan Peats.

"It was diabolical," Irvine told investigators about the "six grand" he gave to Peats early last year. He claimed Peats had said, "Mate, I am not playing footy no more" unless the club honoured his arrangements.

Irvine told the NRL that it wasn't his job to "know every rule inside the NRL". His job was getting players on a bus, feeding them "and making sure no one got caught at strip club".
 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
16,671
He only needs to have knowingly made a false statement to the cops when interviewed. He could simply have concealed the existence of evidence, stated that document X was the original and only agreement with company Y (when it wasn't), stating that the $X of cash withdrawn was used for purpose Z (when it wasn't), or otherwise obstructed knowingly obstructed the police in their attempt to investigate and prosecute a case.

There would be more.specific appropriate offences relating to all of those actions though I would've thought.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
75,110
Are the ATO now obliged to audit the players for the alleged cash payments?

If there is evidence of tax evasion then they will be all over it.

BTW they players could have declared it as income.
 
Messages
19,236
There would be more.specific appropriate offences relating to all of those actions though I would've thought.

There are specific offences that may (or may not) be relevant here....but the difference is that these alleged acts concerned an apparent attempt to interfere with a police investigation. Yes, it is an offence to make a false declaration, but it is a more severe offence to do so in an attempt to lead the cops up the garden path.
 

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
28,679
Are the ATO now obliged to audit the players for the alleged cash payments?
ATO are really small fish in this case in terms of the dollar values being thrown around. They might put onus on players to show they have included all their income and then penalise them maybe 75% plus interest. And who said the players didn't declare the income anyway (probably didn't though)?
Do the Leagues Club and Football Club pay tax? I assume they do. They'd be GST registered at the very least plus do the payments make some sort of fringe benefit? Maybe or maybe just salary and wages. Either way there's issues. So for the ATO I reckon the club, again, will be the focus, plus perhaps the 3rd parties.
I'm assuming ASIC have already done all their part
 

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
28,679
There would be more.specific appropriate offences relating to all of those actions though I would've thought.
There are specific offences that may (or may not) be relevant here....but the difference is that these alleged acts concerned an apparent attempt to interfere with a police investigation. Yes, it is an offence to make a false declaration, but it is a more severe offence to do so in an attempt to lead the cops up the garden path.
I'm fairly certain that perversion of justice is used when the underlying offence is significant and/or when there is more than one act of interference
 
Messages
19,236
I'm fairly certain that perversion of justice is used when the underlying offence is significant and/or when there is more than one act of interference

In practice, yes, that is usually the case. It is not typically used when a person tells one fib. but again, the key aspect is the purpose of the alleged behaviour. You can make a false declaration purely for personal benefit and cop a fraud (or similar) charge, but that is not perverting the course of justice. If you make that or another false declaration to the people responsible for enforcing the law (or potentially to others involved in the legal system) you bring the perverting the course of justice stuff into play.
 
Messages
12,156
If you make that or another false declaration to the people responsible for enforcing the law (or potentially to others involved in the legal system) you bring the perverting the course of justice stuff into play.

so if the nrl was a legal body the parra board could have been done for perverting the course of justice? interesting
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,788
One of those articles says he is in trouble over a stat dec about a driving infringement. I assume that is the obstructing the law bit of the charge.
 
Top