Danish
Referee
- Messages
- 32,020
or the rooters.
I think we'll be 1 more ahead actually. Manly will have played the most top 8 and top 4 sides out of any of the top teams.
or the rooters.
He was even picked for New Zealand before his injury. At many clubs he would be first choice, so laughing at including him is ridiculous. He's a first grade quality player, just like many of our depth players are.
Add em up again.I think we'll be 1 more ahead actually. Manly will have played the most top 8 and top 4 sides out of any of the top teams.
I couldn't care less who we play first week of the finals, I certainly don't see Penrith as an easy win.
Add em up again.
Good on the Panthers. They are the only mildly likeable side left in the running so I'll be jumping on the bandwagon come September.
But seriously, can you name the "many clubs" at which Isaac John would be the first choice 5/8?
Penrith in 2013, a team that won 11 from 24 games and missed the finals by 1 win. John played in 9 of those wins from his 16 games in first grade.
He's a great backup. Most clubs would take him as backup. A few would take him as first string. He could probably crack a spot at Parra, Canberra, Cronulla, Melbourne.
Not sure if the coaches would pick it this way, as coaches love to select blokes out of position ahead of genuine halves. But I would rather him in the halves for the Panthers ahead of any of the following guys:Havili was picked for NZ too... I am a Kiwi, and my response is so what?
But seriously, can you name the "many clubs" at which Isaac John would be the first choice 5/8?
Isaac John wouldn't be first pick for many first grade sides (he's not even that for us), but he's an extremely dependable back up, and we have missed him in that capacity.
This is why the whole premise behind this thread is a load of garbage. Look at the fact that Penrith have beaten the Bulldogs 2x. At this point the Bulldogs are battling to make the 8. If Penrith lost both of those games, the Bulldogs sit comfortably in the top 4* and the hater who started this thread screams SEE! Penrith can't beat any of the good teams!!! If Penrith won those 2 games, which we did, it puts the Bulldogs on the fringe of the top 8 and struggling to make the finals. The hater screams SEE!! Penrith can only beat teams that aren't top 4 premiership contenders. PRETENDERS! Easy draw-easydraw-EASY DRAW!!!!!
It's like if before the season began claiming Penrith had a tough draw because we face the Sharks (finished 5th) and the Knights (prelim finalists) 2x each. As has been mentioned / alluded to at various times in this thread, you can only play who's in front of you and that opponent may or may not be in good form. And its useless analysing this until the end of the regular season.
This is why the whole premise behind this thread is a load of garbage. Look at the fact that Penrith have beaten the Bulldogs 2x. At this point the Bulldogs are battling to make the 8. If Penrith lost both of those games, the Bulldogs sit comfortably in the top 4* and the hater who started this thread screams SEE! Penrith can't beat any of the good teams!!! If Penrith won those 2 games, which we did, it puts the Bulldogs on the fringe of the top 8 and struggling to make the finals. The hater screams SEE!! Penrith can only beat teams that aren't top 4 premiership contenders. PRETENDERS! Easy draw-easydraw-EASY DRAW!!!!!
It's like if before the season began claiming Penrith had a tough draw because we face the Sharks (finished 5th) and the Knights (prelim finalists) 2x each. As has been mentioned / alluded to at various times in this thread, you can only play who's in front of you and that opponent may or may not be in good form. And its useless analysing this until the end of the regular season.
This!!
The other point being bandied around was the fact that Penrith had no Origin players.
Is it really Penrith's fault for not having players selected? I'm absolutely certain that any eligible player in the Penrith squad, whether it was for NSW or QLD, would put their hand up if selected.