What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Put up or shut up, ASADA.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jubileeboy

First Grade
Messages
9,259
There will be nothing from ASADA today, so the players wont be affected.
If there is anything, it will be from the NRL. There will be no $1million dollar fine. If there is, it will formed using the accrued losses to date, which are more than $1 million.
Flanno to be suspended for 3 months.
Elkin & others the same.
The entire NRL "smack down" will be about helping repair the Sharks brand for sponsors & also the NRL brand.
A cleansing.

Gold

:lol::lol::lol:
 

Omnishark2

Juniors
Messages
588
Elkin is obviously the true villian ... good to see he gets shafted for 2 years minimum !!!

Flanno was more a bystander who should have put better governance processes in place ... so he deserved some penalty.

But $1M is excessive (even if $400k is suspended) given it was an 11 week program run by the trainer, compared to the 12 month Essendon program in which the coach was intimately involved.
 

Feej

First Grade
Messages
7,524
This is the NRL's investigation. It's not over. ASADA can still place sanctions on players once THEIR investigation is complete. Won't be over for f**kin ages.

BbpiD0DCAAEuoDP.jpg
 

Mr Angry

Not a Referee
Messages
51,816
The National Rugby League (NRL) has completed its review of governance issues at the Cronulla-Sutherland Sharks Football Club (the Club) in 2010 and 2011 and the preliminary findings have identified serious failures on the part of the Club and certain individuals who had a responsibility to safeguard the health and welfare of its players.

NRL CEO, Mr Dave Smith, announced today the preliminary findings are that the Club breached the NRL Code of Conduct in several respects and that Head Coach Shane Flanagan and the then Head of Strength and Conditioning Trent Elkin were responsible for a number of the failings leading to those contraventions.

In consequence, a Breach Notice has today been issued to the Club which sets out the alleged breach and the proposed penalty and written notification has been given to Mr Flanagan and Mr Elkin of the NRL's intention to take action with respect to their registration.

Mr Smith, however, stressed that the findings are only provisional and that no final view can be reached until the Club, Mr Flanagan and Mr Elkin are afforded a proper opportunity to respond.

"Information of a serious nature has been presented, and following a thorough and rigorous assessment, I have formed a preliminary view that the Club is in breach of the rules and that action needs to be taken with respect to the registrations of two individuals," Mr Smith said.

"Before any final determination is made, I will give full consideration to the contents of any response made by the Club, Mr Flanagan and Mr Elkin."

The preliminary findings against the Club for breach of the NRL Code of Conduct include that it:

- Exposed players to significant potential risks to health
- Exposed players to possible breaches of the NRL Anti-Doping Rules
- Allowed persons without the necessary qualifications and training to administer supplements to players
- Failed to obtain the fully informed consent of players to the administration of particular supplements
- Failed to ensure proper supervision and controls were in place
- Failed to devise and implement systems to ensure compliance with appropriate standards to safeguard the health and welfare of its players
- Failed to take appropriate action when it became aware that unsafe practices had been employed in the administration of supplements to players


The preliminary findings against Shane Flanagan include that he:

- Failed to ensure a safe and healthy work environment
- Failed to properly supervise the Head of Strength and Conditioning
- Failed to ensure the Head of Strength and Conditioning complied with his obligation to inform the Club Doctor about changes that had been made to the supplement program and to obtain his prior approval with respect to those changes
- Failed to take appropriate action when he became aware that unsafe practices had been employed in the administration of supplements to players
- Failed to ensure that the Head of Strength and Conditioning complied with a protocol that had been agreed on 7 April 2011 to the effect that the prior approval of the Club Doctor be obtained with respect to any supplements that were intended to be administered to players


The preliminary findings against Trent Elkin include that he:

- Exposed players to significant potential risks to health
- Exposed players to possible breaches of the NRL Anti-Doping Rules
- Allowed persons without the necessary qualifications and training to administer supplements by injection
- Personally injected players without adequate qualifications and training to do so
- Failed to obtain the fully informed consent of players to the administration of particular supplements
- Failed to comply with his obligation to inform the Club Doctor about changes that had been made to the supplement program and to obtain his prior approval with respect to those changes
- Misrepresented material facts to players in relation to the supplement program
- Failed to comply with a protocol that had been agreed on 7 April 2011 to the effect that the prior approval of the Club Doctor be obtained with respect to any supplements that were intended to be administered to players


The Breach Notice against the Club contains proposed penalties that include:

- A fine of $1,000,000, $400,000 of which will be suspended subject to the satisfaction by the Club of a number of conditions including completion of an independent governance review and further governance changes.




In relation to Mr Flanagan:

- It is proposed that his NRL registration be suspended for 12 months. It is also proposed that this period may be shortened to 9 months if he successfully completes further education and training and demonstrates to the satisfaction of the NRL that he is familiar with and understands his obligations as Head Coach.


In relation to Mr Elkin:

- It is proposed that his NRL registration be cancelled. If that is the final decision, he will of course be at liberty to apply for registration at some time in the future but it is fair to observe that it is unlikely that any such application would receive favourable consideration if it is brought at any time within the next two years. Nevertheless, any future application – whenever made – will be properly considered on its merits.

Given the serious nature and the circumstances, the Club and the individuals have been given until 15 January 2014 to respond. Should a response be received, it will be properly considered before any final decision is made.

Mr Smith indicated that, if the preliminary findings prove to be justified, conduct that could have put at risk the health and well-being of players would be regarded as entirely unacceptable and completely contrary to the game's rules and values.

"We will not accept practices that put our players at risk," Mr Smith said.

"Clubs are obligated to ensure proper processes are in place to protect our players and we will hold clubs and individuals to account if there is a failure to do so.

"The NRL has also taken significant steps to ensure risk is minimised in the future.

"We have established an Integrity Unit, implemented new and sophisticated drug testing procedures, introduced new supplement and medical procedures including mechanisms that elevate the role of doctors. We now have in place a registration system of over 700 staff and personnel," Mr Smith said.
Mr Smith reassured the fans and members of the Club that the NRL would not turn its back on them.
"I understand that the Club and its fans and members will be concerned by what is proposed.

"I want to reassure them that, in arriving at the penalty proposed in the Breach Notice, I have assessed all the mitigating factors, including that there is a new board and management team in place and that they are already making effective changes to build a stronger governance framework.
"I also want to restate that I have not in any sense reached a final view about these matters and the same applies to the course of action I have proposed with respect to Mr Flanagan and Mr Elkin.

"At the appropriate time we will consult with the Club on the terms of the final determination of penalties," Mr Smith said.

In relation to any anti-doping rule violations, while at this stage ASADA has not provided any information warranting any further infraction notices, this investigation remains ongoing.
LINK
 
Messages
21,891
well i for one am ecstatic

dodged a f**king massive bullett there and from all i have seen flanno deserved this holiday

sure a million hurts but no players?????

well none yet

The WADA code and all that bullshit..i mean who knows.

looks like it was Elkin, lack of governance and unprofessional working practices.
 

Vin Fizz

Bench
Messages
2,907
well none yet The WADA code and all that bullshit..i mean who knows. looks like it was Elkin, lack of governance and unprofessional working practices.
Critical words used by Mr Smith "....blah blah blah...injected SUBSTANCES THAT TO THIS DAY ARE UNKNOWN...." Dont think ASADA can do much about that. If they dont know what they are how can we be in breach? Just mho though. I reckon the matter will tail away now and we can get on wif fings. Other clubs might be in their sights now.
 
Messages
13,481
Daniel Lane reports that Sharks assistant coach Peter Sharp was expected to be the embattled club’s first choice to replace Shane Flanagan while he sits out his 12-month suspension.

Sharp coached in Flanagan’s absence during the opening two rounds of the 2013 season while the old board investigated allegations the 2011 team used banned substances.

It's understood from insiders that Sharp would only take on the job if he was promised the job once Flanagan served his 12-month suspension.

If the club could not make that guarantee to Sharp, it was expected they would need to look for a new coach to oversee their 2014 campaign.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...s-sanctions-20131217-2zi8h.html#ixzz2nh42nn8z
 

blacktip-reefy

Immortal
Messages
34,079
So the Club, Flanagan & Elkin have all been charged for the same things?
How many people can be convicted of drink driving the same vehicle at the same time?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top