- Messages
- 20,182
Pretty confident he was a late inclusion as he wasn’t wearing 9.
Yes as he was named in the 21 man NRL squad
Pretty confident he was a late inclusion as he wasn’t wearing 9.
Yeah was wondering if there might have been something like that going onYeah after the NRL played. Eg he had the extra days to get fit. Yes I know it is stupid but it allowed BA to exploit it.
There is talk that next year you will be able to pick the rookies without dispensation. NRL have realised they have got this wrong although it hasnt been passed yet.
Yep but because he played last week and didnt get injured he has to pick him this week. If Kaysa was available Reedy would be at WentyPretty confident he was a late inclusion as he wasn’t wearing 9.
they've already given Arthur the thumbs upThank God we're having a review to fix this mess.