- Messages
- 45,636
The Tigers only got pinged for one ruck infringement.
Yeah, but you earn those dominating the ruck.
The Tigers only got pinged for one ruck infringement.
When have we ever got the stupid out of our game? It's part of our DNA. Today's game only reinforced my personal opinion.Ok. I’m scrapping that debacle. Moving forward Hodgson gets dropped to the bench for a 20 minute stint, Dunster replaced by Lumelume and Paulo back in for Murchie. I think we’d get most of the stupid out of our game and look a lot more solid across 80 minutes.
We didn’t chase the collision or earn the right to play footy on the back of our structures and processes.What an embarrassing display, we fell in against the worst team in the comp. First contact was weak, line speed non existent and kick chase poor. This team looks as stale as month old bread.
He was done 18 months agoHodgo looks done.
6 weeks back from a knee I feel he is getting worse by the week not better.
Dropping Hodgson will help in that regard. He’s weak, slow and isn’t very intelligent. Everyone has to work harder around him. Arthur needs to bite the bullet. I’d take Jake playing that middle role for 10 minutes either side of half time and cover the halves….from me that’s saying something.
He is in defense, his work rate is way behind Rheeeed's, and our big blokes are getting moved around more and tiring to compensate.
That means they have less in the tank when we have the ball.
Hard to argue.He was done 18 months ago
There were plenty of occasions where they should’ve been pinged but weren’t. Us too, but the ref put his whistle away after giving Wests the advantage in the first half.Yeah, but you earn those dominating the ruck.
So I guess Arthur is a scapegoater for dropping Waqa and Simo. Why else drop them? Why do any players get dropped if you can’t single them out for poor performance. When individual players aren’t performing, you drop them to improve the entire team and see if they can improve against a lesser opposition.As soon as you name a single player you’re looking for a scapegoat and not seeing the game objectively. Our biggest issue today was unforced errors (a matter of luck, imo). Our second biggest was our right edge defence, which is a team problem.
As soon as you name a single player you’re looking for a scapegoat and not seeing the game objectively. Our biggest issue today was unforced errors (a matter of luck, imo). Our second biggest was our right edge defence, which is a team problem.
Simonsson wasn’t dropped, and Blake’s confidence is shot. He needs a stint in reserve grade to get back to basics.So I guess Arthur is scapegoater for dropping Waqa and Simo. When individual players aren’t performing, you drop them to improve the entire team and improve them.
So how wasn’t he singled out then? Wasn’t that your argument?Simonsson wasn’t dropped, and Blake’s confidence is shot. He needs a stint in reserve grade to get back to basics.
Our middle defence was an issue before Hodgson came to the club.When you are losing the middle, your edges are gonna suffer.
Hodgson's shortcomings in defence are a big part of that for mine.
They Tigers seemed to grow another leg when Hodgo came back on in the second half...Does anyone think Hodgson isn’t our biggest problem?
Our middle defence was an issue before Hodgson came to the club.
They had 4 actuallyThe Tigers only got pinged for one ruck infringement.