A bit of constructive criticism for the video refs. I think the guys in the video box haven't yet adapted to the new system. They're looking at the same angle three or four times and while that made sense in a system where they had to make a call, it doesn't make sense in a system where there is already an existing call on the field that should only be overturned if there "substantial evidence" that the existing call is wrong.
If after two replays of the prime angle you still can't decide if there is "substantial evidence" that the existing call is wrong then by definition it's not clearly wrong. The existing call should stand, end of enquiry. They seemed to have it right in round one where they'd look at it once, rarely twice, and then make a call. But in rounds two and three they've slipped back into old habits of asking to see things three or four times and slowing things down to frame by frame. It just doesn't make sense under the new system.
Guys you're adding pressure to yourselves that you don't need to. There's an existing decision made by the man in the middle, hide behind that call and stop over analysing it.
