benched tiger
Bench
- Messages
- 3,320
Apart from 2 ordinary passes against the Storm i thought he played well with a busy display.
Farah isn't too old or slow. He's doing exactly what Taylor wants. He's getting the forwards going forward and leaving all playmaking duties to the halves.
Halves who have NFI how to do as they're told and play to set structures.
But the morons out there will just accuse Farah of f**king up.
Farah isn't too old or slow. He's doing exactly what Taylor wants. He's getting the forwards going forward and leaving all playmaking duties to the halves.
Farah is going to contribute more to our success than Brokks and Moses will, if all 3 are allowed to play their natural games.
But thats not happening.
The problem we face isn't Farah. Its the gameplan that has killed Farah's attack, because it will have the same impact on Cherrington.
That's the problem. If Farah can't make this side look better under the current style than Cherrington has no hope.
Thats the concern and its a long term concern.
Farah isn't too old or slow. He's doing exactly what Taylor wants. He's getting the forwards going forward and leaving all playmaking duties to the halves.
Halves who have NFI how to do as they're told and play to set structures.
But the morons out there will just accuse Farah of f**king up.
Farah - absolute legend
Brooks - major league myth - would struggle in nsw cup
Moses -semi myth as their is evidence of ability
I still think Brooks may come good. Then again I also think Siro might come good.
I'm 37. I might still come good for a spot in the centre's too....
Did anyone catch Kent on Triple M this afternoon?
Spoke of the Tigers win record when Farah has played this year, said that he believes Brooks and Moses are intimidated by having Farah on the field and play with much more freedom when he's not out there.
I forget what the stats were but it was interesting.
I still believe that Farah plays to instructions and has played his hand out of frustration because Brooks & Moses have not played to their potential.
The issue is with stats, could Kent have added that Brooks has played better when Woods hasn't played or Moses has been better when Sironen hasn't played?
Also said that it was time Farah looked at the SL which I believe might be true except for the fact that he has this back-ended deal worth huge dollars.
Did anyone catch Kent on Triple M this afternoon?
Spoke of the Tigers win record when Farah has played this year, said that he believes Brooks and Moses are intimidated by having Farah on the field and play with much more freedom when he's not out there.
I forget what the stats were but it was interesting.
I still believe that Farah plays to instructions and has played his hand out of frustration because Brooks & Moses have not played to their potential.
The issue is with stats, could Kent have added that Brooks has played better when Woods hasn't played or Moses has been better when Sironen hasn't played?
Also said that it was time Farah looked at the SL which I believe might be true except for the fact that he has this back-ended deal worth huge dollars.