oldmancraigy
Coach
- Messages
- 11,960
total footy stats has French at 3 try assist - c'mon brains trust - which was that one?
Yes - defence has been very good for the most part.
I don't know what is going on with our attack. Really, it has been bloody ordinary all season bar one game. When Noddy made his comment yesterday about us putting 40 on them, I am sure all eels supporters laughed. We don't currently have that amount of points in us. Very disjointed and clunky it seems.
You'd think he would get try assist AND a linebreak assist on that one?
But I just found the problem with the stats I was looking at (on the official NRL website). They are from 2016.
That's hopeless. How can they not have them up to date?!?
We won because we were able to capitalise on big St George mistakes. Smarter teams won't gift us those opportunities.We also controlled the whole game and won convincingly. You do realise the winner is the team with the most points, not the most LBAs don't you?
That is incorrect. Plus whether or not a linebreak leads to a try isn't the sole responsibility of the merkin who created the linebreak, any more than missed tackles leading to tries is the responsibility of the merkin who missed the tackle.How many LBAs does he have that lead to tries? (the answer is 0 - and 0 try assists altogether).
We are not talking about the result of any given linebreak, we are talking about playing ability that is represented by aggregated statistics (and extrapolated per game).Or, to put it another way, if Gutherson breaks the line HIMSELF draws the fullback, and a try is created, how is French putting a bloke into a gap a better result?
I think Gutherson's playmaking is his weakest aspect. However he is smart and omnipresent and quick enough. This makes him dangerous in broken play, which is why he excels against the weaker teams.Gutherson is perfectly capable of ball playing as a fullback. Just hasn't had the chance 2 wide much this season. He is 2nd in the NRL when it comes to breaking the line himself, and is more than capable of setting up tries.
I don't disagree he is a better all round player than French, especially in defence. One bonus Gutherson brings in attack is that he is big enough to hold the ball and dig into the line when nothing's on - which is often in our extremely disjointed attack.He's a superior player to French in almost every aspect of the game right now, and should be the fullback for the rest of the season.
Eleven metres is not any outside back's best game. Merkins are just enamoured of a couple of highlight moments, picking off runners copping the best hospital passes of the year, and his kick chase which is better utilised at fullback now that our short kicking game is warming up.French played his best game of the year as a winger, and that's his spot going forward - let him use his opportunistic skills there to create tries from nothing.
As I said, this is because he himself has been stifled by our lack of quality halves - French played most of his games outside Gutherson after all.At fullback he was stifling our attack with his '5 dummies in a row before dummying to himself' play. It worked once against the Dragons the first time, and hasn't since.
You're looking at one game as if it's the be all and end all of our season. I'm sure you were doing the same last week after the Darwin game.The dragons made 6 linebreaks yesterday, including 5 LBAs. It did wonders for them!!
Perhaps LBAs aren't the be-all-and-end-all of attacking ability.
Change the drop down to 2017.You'd think he would get try assist AND a linebreak assist on that one?
But I just found the problem with the stats I was looking at (on the official NRL website). They are from 2016.
That's hopeless. How can they not have them up to date?!?
But for LBAs per game French leads our team. That's no accident. He is both wasted outside the spine and contributes too little for a winger.
Hang on, you're arguing French isn't a winger after one game on the wing where he ran for 11mYou're looking at one game as if it's the be all and end all of our season. I'm sure you were doing the same last week after the Darwin game.
Here are some more stats that aren't based on one game...You're looking at one game as if it's the be all and end all of our season. I'm sure you were doing the same last week after the Darwin game.
Here are some more stats that aren't based on one game...
This season we have won 4/9 (44% winning average) with French at fullback and 5/6 (83% winning average) with Guth at fullback. Both of them have played four teams that are currently above us on the ladder.
Did we get a penalty for this ?
It would certainly indicate Arthur's feels he offers enough but it absolutely doesn't mean he's not wasted. Plenty of players play in suboptimal positions because it's better for the team that way. Cameron Munster's running game is wasted in the halves, as is Corey Norman's. Takairangi's playmaking is wasted at centre, as is Hayne's. Plenty of forwards are wasted in the middle.I don't think he will get dropped, which indicates he isn't wasted outside the spine and does contribute enough as a winger.
Or simply Gunco's all round ability is wasted on wingIt would certainly indicate Arthur's feels he offers enough but it absolutely doesn't mean he's not wasted. Plenty of players play in suboptimal positions because it's better for the team that way. Cameron Munster's running game is wasted in the halves, as is Corey Norman's. Takairangi's playmaking is wasted at centre, as is Hayne's. Plenty of forwards are wasted in the middle.
I argued he wasn't a winger last year. The stats you've provided indicate this as do Arthur's comments about French being a fullback.Hang on, you're arguing French isn't a winger after one game on the wing where he ran for 11m
FYI, last year he played 10 games on the wing for an average of 83.8m. That's a much larger sample size wouldn't you say?
Hypocrit much?