Have a look at the halves they were playing outside. Gutherson didn't have to play outside himself.Here are some more stats that aren't based on one game...
This season we have won 4/9 (44% winning average) with French at fullback and 5/6 (83% winning average) with Guth at fullback. Both of them have played four teams that are currently above us on the ladder.
I reckon he's wasted on the wing too.Or simply Gunco's all round ability is wasted on wing
But French only made 11 metres yesterday and scored try, while Gutho was MoM with a double...... we didn't get enough LBA's yesterday, damn! Move French back to fullback, it wasn't enough yesterday Gutho didn't provide enough LBA's!We also controlled the whole game and won convincingly. You do realise the winner is the team with the most points, not the most LBAs don't you?
It just means Gutherson isn't a playmaker, not that he can't play.
Don't forget Ma'u and Edwards and Takairangi. Arthur's loves his playmakers.We have enough playmakers in Moses and Norman. The days of Luke Kelly and Robson are over.
Don't forget Ma'u and Edwards and Takairangi. Arthur's loves his playmakers.
Because we attack on the edges and need blokes who can 'play football'.So why is it so important that our fullback is one too?
You know French isn't just a playmaker though right? None of them are.So let's say we attack down our left, then we currently have 3 playmaking merkins in a row next to each other (Norman, mau, Taka) do we really need a 4th? And on the right we have 2 - Moses and Edwards.
If we move French to fullback then we will likely lose Taka as a center (replaced by Gutho who you say is not a play maker) and we still have the same amount of playmaking in the team whether we attack on our edges or not.