Not picking out anyone in particular, but Snowden was looking like one of the best props in the game at the time, although was playing with injury (sound familiar?) - and I believe the premise of the argument against his signing was that we were "paying overs for a prop" - full stop. Many people thought this was too much to pay for a prop, regardless of credentials, being a local or otherwise. Now we're looking at paying roughly the same amount (50% more cap, 50% more pay) for a guy who ISN'T at the peak of his powers, who is playing with injury, and with no guarantee that he'll return to the form that has him asking such a price.
The fact that the salary cap was going to go way, WAY up was already well known in 2012 - and was the primary basis for my argument that Snowden was worth the money in the long term. We continue to have similar insight into the future of the cap, the same as we did with Snowden.
As I said, Merrin is worth a look for sure - but there is very little difference to signing Merrin at $600k and Snowden at $400k. It's almost the same signing. I support it, just as I supported the Snowden signing. I can't imagine where we'd be without Snowy over the past few years. Lower on the ladder over that period, for starters.