Do we chase Moylan, or do we let the Sharks take him and get Maloney when he is in turn released?
Tom starling
Is there an option C?
Signing anyone in the halves means we lose lamb.
Lamb has already stated that he is prepared to stand aside and welcomes the idea of us signing a Cronk or Maloney and that he doesn't want to leave the club if it happened .
I remember this being said as well. If he is smart and plays the long game he'll see benefit of learning from a Maloney for a few years and get enough games when players are out injured or on rep duty.Lamb has already stated that he is prepared to stand aside and welcomes the idea of us signing a Cronk or Maloney and that he doesn't want to leave the club if it happened .
I reckon Moylan to Sharks, Maloney to Knights.I would personally rather move forward with Watson and Lamb in the halves and Hodkinson and Cogger as backups. I like Maloney as a player but imo the future is Watson and Lamb with Ponga and Levi. That money can be better spent on forwards.
I think Moylan will end up at souths, Cronk to Penrith
I floated the idea of Yates to hooker a while back Nut. If the club had a coach with some foresight a few years ago he would have already made the transition one would think. There's absolutely no doubt he'd be the strongest defender in the comp playing at dummy half if he could make the transition.
My first thought was going all in on Blair and skipping Graham is a bad error... but perhaps missing both of them isn't the end of the world. Blair is a bit hit- and-miss, Graham old and injury prone...
Brown wont touch anyone from the Warriors imo. There is a stench of lazy coming from that club and that's the opposite of what Brown is wantingGive Albert Vete a call, brown could turn him in a stud, Esse, Safs and Vete is a fantastic rotation.