84 Baby
Referee
- Messages
- 29,820
Na I wasn’t really laughing out loudIs that a fact?
Na I wasn’t really laughing out loudIs that a fact?
Yeah but Sims just scores in the corner instead. I doubt French makes the tackle Guth did on him.I agree.
Hindsight is wonderful, but I reckon the match-winning Dragons try gets stopped if French is fullback, because he cleans up the kick.
Is Zane Musgrove related to Shane Muspratt?
How about something like this:
1. French (still think he will go ok with some more game time )
2. Hayne (re-sign)
3. Gutho
4. Jennings (he is contracted)
5. TBC
6. Salmon (yes may not be ready)
7. Moses
8. Paulo
9. TBC
10. Alvaro
11. Moeroa
12. TBC
13. Brown
14. Austin
15. T. rex (re-sign)
16. Manu (plays middle )
17. Mannah
18. Taka
19. Peni
20. Lane
21. Musgrove
22. Maloney
23. Smith
24. Stone
25. GL
26. DA
27. Evans
28. Pritchard (may not have a spot as BA only went with 2 hookers this year so if we sign a new one him or Maloney may not stay)
29. Gennings
30. Smith
31. Marata (yes I know this is 31 players but not sure who misses out to make 30)
32 Hoffman (as above comment)
Maybe a bit light on back up centres
Development
31. Kaufusi (could be top
32. Brown
33. The superstar hooker
34. Fainga’a
35. Not sure
36. Not sure
f**k the eels
f**k the swans
f**k the panthers
f**k the soceroos
f**k bazal
As long as players 18 to 32 on your list are happy to take minimum wage then I think there is a spot for them. Otherwise, they should pack their bags and just f**k off.
Even the ones we just signed?
Also, we don't ever seem to have a definite top 17. We have a top dozen or so, plus another eight to ten fighting for the remaining five spots. Everyone left over is a genuine backup - only playing in the event of multiple players unavailable.I reckon people on here will say that about anyone we sign to be honest.
Just because they will effectively be replacing player 18-30 doesn't mean they aren't seen and signed as a top 17 player. Of course some positions in the top 17 are really only decided during the off-season and trial(s) so we don't actually know until Round 1.
As long as players 18 to 32 on your list are happy to take minimum wage then I think there is a spot for them. Otherwise, they should pack their bags and just f**k off.
Why would we have been seen as a title chance if our squad was full of flaws?Ok Bazal you have caught me out. My IQ is no higher then a chimp.
I am just mucking around though so do not take it personally. Relax.......
But the reality is if we both managed football teams id have a top 4 outfit and average 20k+ crowds whilst you would have the team running like a busted datsun blowing smoke. This is facts Bazal. Accept it. My knowledge of the game is superior. Accept it.
Anyone who says anything negative about the club gets called a death rider.
We are running last. We where seen as a title chance. It hasn't been a bad season, its been a disaster. And our biggest signing is playing NSW CUP.
Ive said it 10000 times. To win a comp you need 2nd rowers who can bust the line by running straight and hard. You need big strong physical wingers and forwards. One who work hard and run hard. We have flaws in our squad all over place and not a junior in NSW cup capable of first grade.
We're paying overs for any player on that list from 18-32 if they're not on minimum wage, because all of them are worth only minimum wage to us.
We might have signed them for more, but we've paid overs.
Also, we don't ever seem to have a definite top 17. We have a top dozen or so, plus another eight to ten fighting for the remaining five spots. Everyone left over is a genuine backup - only playing in the event of multiple players unavailable.
Haha.
French would just tackle the legs. He's proven he can do that just fine, and the backfield is probably the only acceptable place to make first contact around the legs.Yeah but Sims just scores in the corner instead. I doubt French makes the tackle Guth did on him.
As long as players 18 to 32 on your list are happy to take minimum wage then I think there is a spot for them. Otherwise, they should pack their bags and just f**k off.
Your 18th 'best' player is likely to play at least half the season. Do you really want him to only be worth minimum salary?We're paying overs for any player on that list from 18-32 if they're not on minimum wage, because all of them are worth only minimum wage to us.
We might have signed them for more, but we've paid overs.
It would be interesting to look at how many appearances were made by the 18th-25th players to make the most appearances for each of these teams.You'd have to admit though Pou Bear, that most of the teams who have had success over the last few years have probably had a Top 17-20 and filled the rest of the squad with players that are back ups.
Well who on that lost is actually worth more than minimum wage to us in 2019 if they're not considered Top 17 players, which is what the original post was suggesting?
We've got to stop paying too much for players we don't consider in our Top 17.