hindy111
Post Whore
- Messages
- 63,158
Ash Taylor is the new Tim Smith. Could have been anything, then wasn’t.
NO run games mean defenses wait for the pass.... Good halves can run,pass kick.
Ash Taylor is the new Tim Smith. Could have been anything, then wasn’t.
They were talking about this on ABC Radio. He has informed the club that he doesn't intend to take up the option which is in November, reportedly because he believes he is worth more now.
I honestly think Paulo would do a better job in the 6 than Arthur and he's a f**king 120kg propId rather see dantoray Lui thrown in the deep end then see Jake Arthur play another game first grade. I don't give a f**k if he can't tackle Jake arthur offers nothing in attack but an inside pass.
That would be a Sneaky move, Sneaky!I honestly think Paulo would do a better job in the 6 than Arthur and he's a f**king 120kg prop
Apparently Jake was amazing in the Junior Rep Teams.
Ta.I watched a lot of the private schools games and JA was pretty much the best player on the ground in the final with a nice long distance try too, he has some pace compared to those who are his own age
however, I reckon that probably over 90% of those players will never play at NRL level
I think a ball kicked dead in goal from inside your own 40 should be a play the ball to the opposition from their try line.
Reason: it would create space along the defensive line as the d would need to have more defenders back. It would also promote kickers trying to find space again getting away from these kicks deliberately down the fullback s throat.
I reckon a kick from inside your own 10 metres before the 5th, that you get back cleanly inside the opposition 40 should be play on, tackle count restart.
Give the speedsters something to chase and a reward for pure speed.
How can you tell? He was playing against under 20s players.Matti was much better
No, just retrieve the ball without the opposition touching it (no knock on or knock back).Also has merit. Good one.
Wait, do you mean catch on the full?
We can’t afford to lose Moses. Especially knowing who the back up half is.
f**k imagine if we lost Moses to have Jake step into half 2012-2013 all over againI, for one, and becoming less, and less sure of that.
We had 24 tackles in the opposition 20m zone after 30 minutes last night - Moses created nothing.
And that issue has been prevalent for a few years now.
Against the Tigers, he could have iced the game - and he missed the field goal.
He has shelved his running game for some reason (which has always been his biggest asset). Maybe it's Arthur's plan, but as one-dimensional as he is as a coach, surely he's not that daft...
He's not exactly reliable under pressure.
I, for one, would not be too upset if he left because he thinks he's worth $1 million per year, because he simply isn't playing like a player who deserves $1 million per year.
His replacement cannot be Jake, as Jake has no business in First Grade currently - but Moses needs to step up.
f**k imagine if we lost Moses to have Jake step into half 2012-2013 all over again
I don't wanna go through two wooden spoon years againIf Brad let Moses go, to keep Jake, the Leagues Club, and CommBank, would be burned to the ground!
No idea but Masters very much a rocks and diamonds player, much like our defence atm, and we only need good consistent players. Until we get them our team performance will be similar to tonight's result.I suspect one is being looked at as a depth player (Masters) the other as a starter (farnworth)….don’t you?