eels_fan
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,586
Of course, but when you hit finals you increase intensity, not change the system your entire season has been built onFinals are different. You lose now, we can't proceed.
Of course, but when you hit finals you increase intensity, not change the system your entire season has been built onFinals are different. You lose now, we can't proceed.
He bagged Jake to other players and apparently a couple of them told daddy, and that was it….papers stamped !!
It’s not bullshit.Sounds like bulllshit….
- JA was on the bench for round 1 and 2
- JA started round 7 and 8, due to our back injuries crisis
He only played NRL 4 times until round 18…
Nrown started each game between rounds 2 and 14, starting 8 times..
He was then drop round 15 for Rodwell but got a start in round 17…
So JA was hardly in the team when Nrown was dropped….
then BA said he was picking him towards the end of the season, but had broken his finger….
Do you or Jarryd take the top bunk in your cell?You can take it with a grain of salt. However, the person I heard it from would know (at least from Nrown’s perspective). I guess you’d say that’s Unsourced then.
Based on who the source was and the timing and location of when it was said, I'd say it could be bullshit... not saying it is for sure but more than plausible.It’s not bullshit.
and increasing intensity wears you out quicker leading to fatigue, which is amplified when you don't use your entire bench and expect big boys to play long minutes week after weekOf course, but when you hit finals you increase intensity, not change the system your entire season has been built on
Haha nah we’re the biggest club in the game. Look at all the premierships we won before Brad Arthur joined the club ffs
1999 was a lost opportunity as well in the Brian Smith era.Well mate we probably should of won it it 2001 (choked) and 2009(bar cheats)
We also had a top chance in 1998 and 2005. That's 4 x we got to either the GF or game before. I reckon there may of even been another time. But 4 very successfull seasons in 11yrs where we either got to GF or game before.
BA has had 9 yrs and done neither.
Just a tiny club with tiny dreams.
Bloody Rheedy telling stories again...........Based on who the source was and the timing and location of when it was said, I'd say it could be bullshit... not saying it is for sure but more than plausible.
I think there were just fewer strong clubs back then. Look at our past six years in the finals. Seven losses but all/most of them to bigger clubs:Well mate we probably should of won it it 2001 (choked) and 2009(bar cheats)
We also had a top chance in 1998 and 2005. That's 4 x we got to either the GF or game before. I reckon there may of even been another time. But 4 very successfull seasons in 11yrs where we either got to GF or game before.
BA has had 9 yrs and done neither.
Just a tiny club with tiny dreams.
Well mate we probably should of won it it 2001 (choked) and 2009(bar cheats)
We also had a top chance in 1998 and 2005. That's 4 x we got to either the GF or game before. I reckon there may of even been another time. But 4 very successfull seasons in 11yrs where we either got to GF or game before.
BA has had 9 yrs and done neither.
Just a tiny club with tiny dreams.
Go have a look at fox sports page today and comeback to me!!!!Sounds like bulllshit….
- JA was on the bench for round 1 and 2
- JA started round 7 and 8, due to our back injuries crisis
He only played NRL 4 times until round 18…
Nrown started each game between rounds 2 and 14, starting 8 times..
He was then drop round 15 for Rodwell but got a start in round 17…
So JA was hardly in the team when Nrown was dropped….
then BA said he was picking him towards the end of the season, but had broken his finger….
On occasion, I get things rightHow do you know that?
Players opinion regarding his son mean nothing, the man is deluded, more will be exposed!Very poor if true. I’ve heard Brad Arthur say that he asked the players for their opinions on whether Jake should be in the team. If he’s only willing to accept yes as an answer then it would be rather disingenuous of him to act as if their opinions actually mattered in the end.
Is this the Michael Jennings bombshell for us this year.Nepotism at Parra? Never
Parramatta Eels rocked by bombshell ‘nepotism’ report on eve of final
Parramatta Eels rocked by bombshell ‘nepotism’ report on eve of finalwww.foxsports.com.au
The report doesn't seem to have too much directly to do with the operations of the NRL side, but the fact that it has been leaked is interesting. It's doubtful Brown would've leaked it, so it has to be someone within the club. I suspect this could be a "first strike" prelude of what may follow should we fail to get over the Raiders tomorrow night.Is this the Michael Jennings bombshell for us this year.
Was literally thinking the same thing. This is old-school, Parra the basketcase stuff, for something like this to leak the day before the semi final. Not good at all.Is this the Michael Jennings bombshell for us this year.
Oh well it’s another convenient excuse for the Nepotism Gnome.Is this the Michael Jennings bombshell for us this year.