Yes - but it goes to why he didn't want to return when his plans fell through.
And I've no doubt that his legal team will try to argue that the signing "under false pretences" led to Lomax developing mental health concerns, which are further exacerbated by not being allowed to play.
Or something like that.
I've seen this movie before.
But no circumstances changed between him asking for the release and then agreeing with the terms of the release.
If there was no scenario of him wanting to return to us then he shouldn’t have agreed to the stipulation and by doing so knowing he had no intention of ever giving us the option then he didn’t negotiate in good faith.
Which I guess given he’s failed to complete consecutive contracts is shame on us for thinking he would.
And there would definitely be some aspects for review if he went down mental health path, but unless he’s going to level accusations that he left an unsafe environment (and is opting to head to a Bellamy team?), then those mental health concerns occurred after the agreed release. No one is stopping him playing rugby league.
Even if the court is favourable to him, it’ll be months before he’s given that clearance and what effect do you reckon a mental health claim has on his prospects in a high intensity work environment? As big a red flag as failing to complete contracts.