Drop the rhetoric.Of course it is. Every week blokes are cited and charged for things that other dont
Thanks for the, err, contribution?Looks like you've got it all worked out, friend.
Drop the rhetoric.
Give examples.
Thanks for the, err, contribution?
I don't need to contribute any longer, you've convinced me.
Drop the rhetoric.
Give examples.
"Every week blokes are cited and charged for things that other dont"
25 weeks worth of examples.
You have almost provided one example. Who committed a similar act to Cordner there and got suspended?
The time he knocked Moylan out and got away with a fine?Burgess
The time he knocked Moylan out and got away with a fine?
Agreed that was very inconsistent with other punishments handed down this year.
Uhhh, that was last year?No, when Burgess raised arm hit Morris he got 2 weeks. Cordner doesn’t even get cited
So are you whinging about consistency this year, or trying to angle at favouritism comparing an incident last year to this year?Yes
I’m sure you can come up with a few from this year as well if you wish but it was no surprise that Burgess is suspended and a Cordner not cited
Just increase the fines for these one and two game bans. $5k first charge then increase $5k every subsequent charge. I can guarantee by the time players are getting to $30k+ they will cut the sht out! Save bans for the really serious stuff.
I believe that when decisions are made to penalise one person whilst another is not, it’s corrupt
The problem with fines
Fines are ok for players on $110k base salary
But pointless for players on $1 mil salaries
You said every week. I want at least 20 examples, just to be fair to you. It seems so rife according to you, that this should be a piece of piss.Yes
I’m sure you can come up with a few from this year as well if you wish but it was no surprise that Burgess is suspended and a Cordner not cited