More hater rubbish. In my defence, I did manage to let it go for the first 3 posts.
Watson was the 5th pace option in Adelaide. You must have missed the fact that Mitch Marsh played. The fact he wasn't in the all rounder role might be a reasonably important consideration when evaluating Watsons all rounder bowling load.
In Mebourne he bowled 16 out of 128. Essentially saving the 3 pacemen 1 x 4 over spell each per day or holding up one end for about 30min a session. 10-12 a day doing that is very useful and is what is required from that role. If it's not, you have issues with your main attack and you need to look at them. If an important 6-8 tight over spell is needed, then that responsibility should fall with a main bowler. Why shouldn't it ? You do have 4 of them, all selected specifically to bowl, and a cricket pitch only has two ends. If none of them are up to that task and you are searching for the all rounder, it's not the all rounder you need to be looking at.
