For a start, I said I haven't read anything else in the press - so if you want to forward anything to me, I'll look at it and pass judgement. At the minute, I'm passing it on her. Who just so happens to be a woman. Trust me, that's nothing meaningful what gender is she. I trust she got that job on merit, not because she's a woman, and I'll treat her and her words as equal.
She said he had not been found guilty of anything but then - as I said before - explicably linked him to the carrying out of domestic violence in the next breath. It rendered what she said as absolutely useless. These anti domestic violence messages have a place, absolutely they do. When the guy hadn't even been charged or convicted at the time, and you're discussing the horrors of domestic violence in the same segment as his name? That's piss poor. You may disagree, that's your call. My call is that in this day and age of talk/post/write now, think later that everyone fires a gun in the heat of the moment - as they did with SKD - and worries about repercussion and verdict much later.
