I hope they sue.
Then the judiciary members will have to explan the inconsistantcies (sic) in their findings. Do they and/or the NRL really want every contentious decision the judiciary has handed down since 1998 ? eg why was this player charged and not this one, why did this player get 6 weeks and this one 4 ?
Just from last nights game, why did tellyapapa not get penalised and faualogo got a number of weeks for a similar offence last year ? WHy did white get only a penalty when luke o'donnel got sent off ? If you apply these principals to every charge over the past decade the judiciary member might suddly find they have a lot of explaining to do.
Does the NRL really want it's dirty laundry aired in public ?
totally not true - if they do sue it will have nothing to do with issues like talapapa because that's not the judiciary's call - it's the refs.
to answer a charge in court waldron and bellamy would have to prove there was substantial truth to what they said - that the judiciary predetermined the result and that bookies were notified.
good luck to them doing it and it would be a colossal waste of money for both sides (which are both - really - just the nrl and news)
there's no way there'll be a lawsuit.
it will get league some press in melbourne thought - so well done boys!