Slater or Hayne

[johns_reds]

The fact that hayne couldn't beat nuffy's in the past four or five years to SOO fullback then that tells you how good he is (not very)

Hayne is in a purple patch right now, when he can be as consistent as slater has been over the past 8 or 9 years then you can start comparing him.

I still think Inglis is the best player in the game right now and the best fullback.

 

[WaznTheGreat]

The fact that hayne couldn't beat nuffy's in the past four or five years to SOO fullback then that tells you how good he is (not very)

Hayne is in a purple patch right now, when he can be as consistent as slater has been over the past 8 or 9 years then you can start comparing him.

I still think Inglis is the best player in the game right now and the best fullback.

Derp,Hayne has been playing SOO for 8 years,you don't play SOO for 8 consecutive years if you're not consistent

 

[blaza88z]

Derp,Hayne has been playing SOO for 8 years,you don't play SOO for 8 years in a row if your not consistent

Plod plod you go

how many of those have been at fullback please?

 

[WaznTheGreat]

how many of those have been at fullback please?

I think he has played 5 or 6 at FB for NSW and only lost one of those games so he basically has like a 80% + win rate against QLD when playing FB.

Hayne > QLD

 

[carcharias]

So team form now = individual form.

Top shelf effort. Considering you follow Scumnulla it actually makes a bit more sense.

You said current form. ( the last month )
Warriors beat them about 42 nil.
Rabbits also clobbered them

So
Slater is only good because of his team mates -
Whereas Hayne is only bad because of his team mates?
When Hayne plays for Australia what position does he play?
Who plays fullback?

 

[The Elephant In The room]

The fact that hayne couldn't beat nuffy's in the past four or five years to SOO fullback then that tells you how good he is (not very)

Hayne is in a purple patch right now, when he can be as consistent as slater has been over the past 8 or 9 years then you can start comparing him.

I still think Inglis is the best player in the game right now and the best fullback.

At least JH has never been relegated to the bench by a hopeless AFL player at SOO level.

 

[Slug]

One word.

Greg Inglis.

 

[thorson1987]

At least JH has never been relegated to the bench by a hopeless AFL player at SOO level.

No, but he was relegated to the wing by Kurt Gidley which is alot worse.

 

[timka4]

Hayne hasn't been always selected at fullback because of his great ability to play anywhere from 2-5. If he wasn't so good at those positions, he would of easily been kept at fullback. Like Joey with his some of his non-selections at halfback

 

[gypsy]

One word.

Greg Inglis.

Who just happens to be a Slug. Ironic?

 

[JJ]

No, but he was relegated to the wing by Kurt Gidley which is alot worse.

:lol: how is it his fault the selectors were geniused???

as above the"immortal" was hooker at times, selectors make decisions, nothing more

 

[Charlie124]

Slater. And it isnt even close, as im sure has been said a million times already, hes a far more consistently great performer than Hayne who at his best is fantastic, but not at his best consistently.

 

[eozsmiles]

Anyone who would pick Slater over Hayne in their team today must have Smith, Cronk, and Roberts helping out.

 

[hineyrulz]

The fact that hayne couldn't beat nuffy's in the past four or five years to SOO fullback then that tells you how good he is (not very)

Hayne is in a purple patch right now, when he can be as consistent as slater has been over the past 8 or 9 years then you can start comparing him.

I still think Inglis is the best player in the game right now and the best fullback.

Are you always drunk when you post or just incredibly stupid????

 

[Delboy]

If we were being honest, then either Hayne or Slater would be at most clubs

They are great in different ways, a silly argument really, they do a great job in the structure they have end of story

 

[blaza88z]

One word.

Greg Inglis.

that's not one word

 

[TheFrog]

Hayne's as elusive a runner as I've ever seen, and a superb last line defender as well as we saw in the Origin. But a playmaker he isn't. If he were he'd have been put in the halves years ago.

So while Hayne is going to get you a few tries against flabbergasted defences that hold off him, the playmaking fullbacks will get your entire team moving.

Honestly I wouldn't swap him for Moylan, especially at the price he would command.

 

[MrAnonymous]

Hayne's as elusive a runner as I've ever seen, and a superb last line defender as well as we saw in the Origin. But a playmaker he isn't. If he were he'd have been put in the halves years ago.

So while Hayne is going to get you a few tries against flabbergasted defences that hold off him, the playmaking fullbacks will get your entire team moving.

Honestly I wouldn't swap him for Moylan, especially at the price he would command.

Im sorry, but this is possibly one of the stupidest thing I have ever read.

 

[POPEYE]

Slater. And it isnt even close, as im sure has been said a million times already, hes a far more consistently great performer than Hayne who at his best is fantastic, but not at his best consistently.

You've done it again Charlie, the voice of the silent majority, a true Rugby League aficionado

 

[JJ]

You said current form. ( the last month )
Warriors beat them about 42 nil.

How exactly does that reflect on Hayne?