flippikat
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,359
Seems kiwi fans are not that interested in watching Australian clubs in union, would it be different in league?
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/rugby-...TH_R-xzuTFbjSsbTtTC3otkwcKOcpx3R2_5RfVJZO-rOY
As the story says, the gap between NZ & Australian RU teams is the real turn-off for fans with any combined Super Rugby competition. The best young rugby talent in Australia goes to RL most of the time.
Interesting that the article suggests a solution for NZ with the 5 current NZ teams, plus a 6th NZ team (Tauranga?), Moana Pacifika, and Fiji added to make 8 teams. That would leave Australia with an awkward 5-team competition.. so they may add a Japanese team to level the numbers.
Of course, the simplest solution would be to allow NZ players to play in Aussie teams & still qualify for the All Blacks (maybe a quota of X players per squad, tops) - improves NZ's depth, gives Aus a talent boost, allows players to earn a bit 'across the ditch'... but NZ Rugby would never swallow that.
Anyway, back to NRL.. I think the problem with NZ2 in many AUSTRALIAN eyes is that they see the Warriors failing to deliver on their potential most seasons & assume the same will happen with a 2nd team. It's not necessarily so, and not having a monopoly on NZ *may* spur the Warriors to lift their game on and off the field.. but a lot depends on the initial set-up.