MarkInTheStands
Coach
- Messages
- 15,064
Yeah I heard word that Dunster was staying and would benefit from being fit for an off season
That information is unavailable.Maybe a separate thread listing the options (it’ll be longer than a Ram rant) with decision dates
He’ll at least benefit from getting paid another year. What are his other options? TAFE?Yeah I heard word that Dunster was staying and would benefit from being fit for an off season
Just make it up FFS!That information is unavailable.
Exactly, which is why Gronk’s theory of both parties having to agree is preposterous. If Dunster stays we can officially put this notion to bed.Surely if both parties have to agree for an MO to be activated, there is no way Dunster will be here next year.
Preposterous!Exactly, which is why Gronk’s theory of both parties having to agree is preposterous. If Dunster stays we can officially put this notion to bed.
Welcome to 2024I'm not sold based on sources posted so far that both parties have to agree for a MO - otherwise it's just the same as negotiating a new/extended contract, and hence pointless.
I think it's more far more likely a MO means a situation where there is a CO at the higher (current salary) price and also/then a PO at a lower (potentially minimum) price.
I think it shows NRL media is run by staff 'journos' who don't understand what a PO is and don't have the curiosity to consider what it might actually mean. The best (and really only) explanation is that there is both a PO and CO in effect.I don't think that phrase means what some are taking it to mean.
It's a very unclear phrase that can be read to support both proposed interpretations of what an MO actually is.
This has been my position on MOs for many years.Welcome to 2024
I wouldn't even call NRL website pages like that "media" - it's largely static content, in some cases I suspect poorly written by "comms people". A journalist never sets foot near that stuff.I think it shows NRL media is run by staff 'journos' who don't understand what a PO is and don't have the curiosity to consider what it might actually mean. The best (and really only) explanation is that there is both a PO and CO in effect.
This year I wouldn’t say comms people. Most of their (and any other league news website) releases read like a work experience kid on ChatGPTI wouldn't even call NRL website pages like that "media" - it's largely static content, in some cases I suspect poorly written by "comms people". A journalist never sets foot near that stuff.
I don't think that phrase means what some are taking it to mean.
It's a very unclear phrase that can be read to support both proposed interpretations of what an MO actually is.
No guys. This isn’t even yr9 legal studies level. In the purest of vanilla terms, mutual option clauses in sports contracts are:I think it shows NRL media is run by staff 'journos' who don't understand what a PO is and don't have the curiosity to consider what it might actually mean. The best (and really only) explanation is that there is both a PO and CO in effect.