There's no probably about it. Brisbane will bring more , a lot more to the NRL than Perth for the next 10 year , at least. And Average view is what the advertisers want. So until that changes talking about unique viewers is irrelevant! - As well as being nonsensical.
There's no way that we can know for certain that Brisbane 2 will bring more viewers than Perth until we try it. One thing is for certain though, Perth will bring more new viewers than Brisbane, especially over the long term.
A unique viewer is an individual that can be confirmed to have watched content at least once. With average ratings (on Tv, it's different on the internet) you are just getting the average amount of people that were watching a program at any one time, but here's the thing about averages, because of technological constraints they are often guesstimates and you can't confirm how many of those people were unique viewers.
One of the main reasons that advertisers are investing way more money into advertising online is because they can get much better metrics on unique viewers, i.e. Youtube, Twitter, etc, can tell them that x amount of unique IP addresses saw their ad.
Mate, anyone who has any authority is a' numpy' according to you! He thought different to you so hes a numpy?????
He's not a numpty because he is a position of power, he's a numpty because he has literally outright stated that instead of working on the areas of the sport that need the most help (i.e. everything outside of Sydney and Brisbane that is dead or dying), he is going to focus on appeasing the powerful people in Sydney, and he has already disenfranchised a bunch of important people in the process!
It'd be a bit like if a politician openly ran with the policy of raising the poor's taxes and lowering the rich's, it's insane, but I guess if you are on of the rich it's a good deal...
BTW, there have been more than a few people in positions of authority that I've liked, but they never last long because they are always looking to make changes to improve the sport instead pandering to nostalgia, and the clubs and media in Sydney. So they always get stabbed in the back before they can get anything done.
So do you think 10 or7 will think differently when it coms to Gyngels remarks?
Seven definitely disagree with Gyngell, if they didn't they wouldn't have supported AFL expansion for years.
Aren't you also one of those Super League was the devil types?
If so why are you like 'the NRL should sell it's soul to do whatever is best for this broadcaster' when you'd have argued the exact opposite when News was the broadcaster throwing cash around?
You seam like a real glass half full type of guy
Mate if you went to the pub and ordered a schooner, and they gave you a glass that was half empty then when you complained they said to you 'you're just being negative, it's not half empty it's half full' you'd be pissed too.
The whole half full saying is just people trying to distract you from issues that you have brought up, by blaming you for noticing the problems so they don't have to take responsibility for the problems they've failed to address or have outright ignored. It's a desperate attempt to get you to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
