What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Take Action on the Development.

Card Shark

Immortal
Messages
32,237
The Dept of Planning & Infrastructure recommended to the Planning Assessment Commission that it should be approved back on Mon 2nd July. Apparently they had a maximum of 45 days to make a decision.

If it is 45 calendar days, it is Thursday 16th August. If it 45 business days, it is the 3rd September.

Surely it's calendar days, so it has to be bloody close!
 

Megalodon

Juniors
Messages
213
"Normal" requirement is within 42 calendar days of the DOP recommendation being received by PAC.

The Minister has the authority to approve a 14 calendar day extension beyond that.

"Before the end of August."
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,443
Geez .Is this another fly in the ointment?
Yesterday's Leader"
Shark Delaypage 11.
"
Ä delay on the Cronulla Sharks development application might take longer than expected.The status of the inquiry on the PAC assessment was äwaiting information".A spokeswoman said this notation was made when further information had been requested by the DoP and infrastructure,and was unlikely to be provided in "two to three days".

Was this another greeny delaying tactic?A report on likely tsunamis in the next 100 years? Or has someone found another green bell frog near the car park? Or has George tied himself to a mangrove ?

Anyone in the know ?
 

Megalodon

Juniors
Messages
213
Geez .Is this another fly in the ointment?
Yesterday's Leader"
Shark Delaypage 11.
"
Ä delay on the Cronulla Sharks development application might take longer than expected.The status of the inquiry on the PAC assessment was äwaiting information".A spokeswoman said this notation was made when further information had been requested by the DoP and infrastructure,and was unlikely to be provided in "two to three days".

Was this another greeny delaying tactic?A report on likely tsunamis in the next 100 years? Or has someone found another green bell frog near the car park? Or has George tied himself to a mangrove ?

Anyone in the know ?

That's just the Leader back-tracking on what they had stated in a previous article.

The reality of the situation is that they really don't have any new information and are just filling in column centimetres.

The date of the determination by PAC remains "Before the end of August."
 

Dogs Of War

Coach
Messages
12,721
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...lan-refused-20120812-242se.html#ixzz23MuyzpMw
Sharks: club will be dead in the water if plan refused

FEARS the Cronulla Sharks will fold is clouding debate over a $300 million club expansion that would transform the skyline, with towers up to 14 storeys, opponents say, in a debate that has divided neighbouring Liberal MPs.
The Cronulla Sutherland Leagues Club, which cannot afford a chief executive, says its future hinges on the approval of a retail-residential development around Toyota Stadium at Woolooware, including a shopping and restaurant complex and eight new buildings comprising 600 apartments.
Approval would grant the club an immediate boost of $10 million to pay off a $13 million debt it says was brought on by declining revenue and crippling interest repayments. The club would also receive at least $1 million a year from retail rents.
At a public forum last month, the Sports Minister and Miranda MP, Graham Annesley, noted concerns over the proposal but said some development applications went deeper than ''bricks and mortar issues''.
Advertisement
''If the club folds due to financial pressures, the repercussions will be felt far beyond just Sharks fans in the shire. [It] would almost certainly also have repercussions for the competition structure and potential revenues of the National Rugby League itself,'' he said.
But the plan has drawn opposition from the Liberal Cronulla MP, Mark Speakman, who said the survival argument was not backed by hard evidence. ''I don't doubt that they have very serious problems … but [the club] hasn't produced any quantitative analysis showing why they need something as big as this,'' he said.
Earlier this year, the consortium behind the proposal responded to public concern by reducing building heights on several towers and cutting the number of units by 100.
But critics say the plan remains too large, traffic will be gridlocked at peak times and, according to Sutherland council, will function as a ''privately owned internalised shopping mall'', rather than a town centre.
The Department of Planning found in favour of the proposal and the Planning and Assessment Commission will make a final decision.

The only part I see that could be an issue is the gridlock caused by having all those people living there. Any time frame for when the Planning and Assessment Commission makes there final decision?
 

shaggs

Coach
Messages
11,002
Isn't that article a rehash of assorted other articles we have already seen?

A lot of those lines seem to be cut and pasted together from previous months.
 

Ausguy

Coach
Messages
14,887
Reading that again... What a terribly negative article.

Don't mention the jobs created, ongoing community assets or improved sporting facilities for local clubs. Not to mention more housing. Smh can get farked
 

Weaponhead

Coach
Messages
10,544
Nothing new from the SMH. No inside word or summation of the positive arguments.

The traffic issue is mitigated by the fact that they are already widening the road for extra lanes and that most of the industry in Kurnell has fallen over. The development is surrounded by water, factories, golf course and schools. It couldn't be better placed to minimise impact on residents.
 

Latest posts

Top