nqcowboy87
Bench
- Messages
- 4,181
sydney convicts ay
well its true what they say about guys in prison?
well its true what they say about guys in prison?
You're not a troll for disagreeing with me, but you're obviously just being critical for the sake of it, trollesque behaviour.
Umm, Flapper... it wasn't.
myannonymoususername posted in agreeance with me at 10:44pm
http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=5721549&postcount=1339
You contributed to this thread with your dribble at 10:47pm
http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=5721556&postcount=1342
Ouch.
Tried? I did. I called him an "absolute idiot" - which is what he is. During the Matthew Johns saga he concluded a segment on the whole thing by saying "and that's the end of that whole shebang" and I didn't watch the rest of this show but from what some posters have said on here, he seems to have had another slip.
If you honestly think that Fatty is an intelligent man and a good TV host, you will be in a minority. In fact, you'd be the only one. He is a bumbling, moronic idiot who people laugh at and not with.
I know Richard Reed wasn't offended. The segment wasn't offensive at all. But when Fatty and Soward were trading a few jokes afterwards on the panel, they came close to crossing the line towards being offensive.
One key thing for you to realise ( and I know that at you're level of intelligence this would be difficult to comprehend) is that everyone has different tolerance levels in terms of what is offensive. I'm not gay, but I can understand why gays would be offended by the Elton John segment. I am a Jew and I find South Park hillairious, especially when it is mocking Jews, but my cousins find it despicable.
No I'm not. You can read through my post history, I have always been critical of the Footy Show and a lot of people on this forum who seem to believe that the sport of Rugby League and those involved in it don't have to meet the same moral standards as the rest of us.
It is clear, Flapper, that you are an absolute idiot. You were unable to comprehend my post and understand the point that I am trying to make. The Footy Show are in the middle of an investigation of a segment that some gays consider offensive, and they decide to put themselves in a position where Fatty could have made things a lot worse. Why couldn't they have picked someone else or have someone other than Fatty who doesn't think before words come out of his mouth quite often?
WTF is this sh*t.
Rainbow warriors hit NRL
THE meaty blokes on the NRL's The Footy Show are braving the appearance of two-time Gay World Rugby Cup champions the Sydney Convicts (2005 and 2008) on tonight's show. Homophobia in sport is the topic. The show has been running a segment about the forgotten (and fictional) Johns brother, Elton Johns, who loved music and outlandish clothes, unlike his footballing brothers Andrew and Matthew Johns. Sydney's gay community decided to do something about it and asked producer Gary Burns to let them speak. Burns agreed. "The main reason we want to go on the show is to provide a face for gay rugby players to the mainstream media and general public," Convicts club president Charlie Winn says.
Not really. I just hate the Footy Show, always have thought it is an embarassment to the game, and Ch 9's sad attempt to cater to the bogan market. Its neither useful for league news, nor funny, so fails miserably on both counts.
I'd prefer to watch a serious discussion about the footy. NRL on Fox was more like it although I reckon now they spend more time clowning around and less discussing the games.
The model I'd like to see is something like "On the Couch" they used to have late nights on 7 for AFL. Just a couple of journos, and a couple of guests chewing the fat over last week's games, the ones coming up and other stuff to do with the game. Was a decent show. Something similar for league would be good.
Not really. I just hate the Footy Show, always have thought it is an embarassment to the game, and Ch 9's sad attempt to cater to the bogan market. Its neither useful for league news, nor funny, so fails miserably on both counts.
I'd prefer to watch a serious discussion about the footy. NRL on Fox was more like it although I reckon now they spend more time clowning around and less discussing the games.
The model I'd like to see is something like "On the Couch" they used to have late nights on 7 for AFL. Just a couple of journos, and a couple of guests chewing the fat over last week's games, the ones coming up and other stuff to do with the game. Was a decent show. Something similar for league would be good.
I could be wrong, but you are defending him in that very sentence.I've never defended Fatty once, I think in this instance he just was going with the flow, as it were.
Maybe to someone who cannot understand English.You can call me an absolute idiot all you like, whatever helps your internet persona, I knew the point you were making, I just thought it was clutching at straws at the time. These gay guys on now may be reinforcing your point about the Richard Reed segment, but it looked you were trying to make something offensive out of something that wasn't.
"I know that segment was not in the slightest bit homophobic" was it there?I know that segment was not in the slightest bit homophobic, but with Fatty being an absolute idiot, he came mighty close to saying some homophobic shyte afterwards. Why do they want to try and put themselves in that position?
Yeh it didn't matter to you AT ALL at the time.As for the time thing, I could be wrong, it matters not to me, might to you, not to me. If I'm wrong, it wouldn't be the first time. Doesn't make me the absolute idiot you claim I am.
Ignoring my rational response in favour of more brainless trolling I see? f**king pathetic.
But since you were proven wrong, it doesn't matter of course.Well considering my post was before the one agreeing with you that you replied to one would obviously consider it ignored.
did Magnay really tip the Raiders coz of Dugan?
did Magnay really tip the Raiders coz of Dugan?
yes
he defines the Raiders ethos apparently. even though he's not playing
she has nfi and should write for womens weekly