On the topic of players not cooperating, I can honestly see this conversation happening back in April;
"Guys we need to stick together on this. We will have a vote as a team, forget about managers, administrators and directors, let's all agree to either co operate as a team or refuse all co operation as a team."
I am upset the players haven't co operated, but I would be even more upset if a few players had co operated and others didn't. To me, that would have seemed more suspicious than the current situation where the entire team refuses to co operate.
I'm not a Storm sympathiser (all though I am a Storm Fan sympathiser), I can't see any more punishments that would do anything for other club's player, administrators or fans.
When you look at the legality of the current contracts players have tied to the club (not the other way, if the club didn't pay or broke contracts, the club is liable to the individual player), the only legal solution, which may soothe the greater NRL's fans is for the NRL to deregister all of the current Storm playing roster, and then allow the Storm to have first bids to their own players. This means the Storm would effectively be rebuilding its team from scratch, whilst giving other clubs the chance of snapping up players which the Storm will not be able to afford.
Is there a legal precedence, which would allow the NRL to deregister players, without allowing the players to sue the club or competition??