- Messages
- 28,154
Didn't he do it to the Kiwis too?
Seeing the obnoxious weed get hit for six is quite therapeuticalNot just the Ashes either...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfbhpld4HZ0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfbhpld4HZ0
I don't see it as any different to a fast bowler throwing down a slow ball, albeit a bit more extreme. I guess more like a fast bowler charging in then pulling up and throwing down an off spinner (which is perfectly legal I believe).
I think I would be fair though to also allow bowlers to choose to bowl over or around the wicket on a whim to even it up. Might make it a bit tougher for them to get LBW decisions but if it's restricted to T20 then that's not much of a problem
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/tweak-rules-and-let-the-bowlers-switch-it-up-too-urges-kasprowicz-20120202-1qvld.html
Tweak rules and let the bowlers switch it up too, urges Kasprowicz..
Michael Chammas
February 3, 2012
IN AN era of international cricket where the ball is finally starting to make inroads in the battle against the bat, David Warner is threatening to tilt the balance back in favour of the batsman.
His switch-hitting ability, which he demonstrated against India on Wednesday night with a massive six, has the potential to revolutionise the sport and ensure the game of cricket favours those with the willow.
While several former Australian fast bowlers aren't disgruntled by Warner's plan of attack, Michael Kasprowicz has devised a method to ensure bowlers aren't copping the raw end of the deal.
Advertisement: Story continues below
The former Australian paceman hasn't got a problem with switch hitting but believes the rules need to be tinkered to give the bowler the upper hand. ''He's more than welcome to do that, but on two conditions,'' Kasprowicz said.
''One: the ball cannot be deemed to be pitching outside leg stump for an lbw. And the second one is, the benefit of the doubt should then go to the bowler. If the batsman decides to switch hit, the umpire should drop the outside leg rule and the benefit of the doubt should then go in favour of the bowler, not the batsman. If that happens, they're more than welcome to do it.''
Warner defended the ploy in a series of tweets last night. ''In my mind I think it's OK to do so because we get out we are out, the bowler gets hit and he still has five deliveries,'' he said.
England's Kevin Pietersen was the first to play the shot back in 2008 against New Zealand, which even led to a cola commercial featuring the incredible shot. But Warner has now taken over the mantle as the king of switch, hitting some mammoth sixes for NSW in the Twenty20 Champions League last year and again on Wednesday night against India at ANZ Stadium.
But as cricket continues its accelerated evolution, Kasprowicz hopes administrators take a similar stance and allow bowlers to introduce a variation of their own.
''If batsman can then bowlers should be able to bowl left or right as well,'' he said. ''I had a shoulder reconstruction in 2000 and coming back to training I tried to teach myself to bowl left-arm. Just very gentle swing, nothing much to it, really. But eventually there will be someone that comes along with that sort of skill and I think it will be exciting to see.''
Mike Whitney, who lived next to Warner in Matraville when the master blaster was a child, echoed the sentiments of Kasprowicz. Whitney was at ANZ Stadium when Warner blasted Ravichandran Ashwin into the stands and believes he should be encouraged to do it more.
While some bowlers are opposed to the idea of switch hitting, Whitney said the risk associated with playing the shot outweighed the result, highlighting the chance of picking up a wicket.
''It's a really risky and dangerous shot to play,'' Whitney said. ''But it's also incredible. For some reason, Davey Warner can pull it off. I don't think I'd be fazed by it but I'm sure R. Ashwin wasn't too happy with it. I wouldn't be deterred by it because it's such a risky shot. But he's special, he's really special, and if he can pull that off then I say good luck to him.''
Warner's teammate, David Hussey, is one of several Australian players to feel the brunt of Warner's switch hitting in the nets.
While he admitted he had been frustrated bowling to him, Hussey said rules shouldn't be introduced to prevent him from playing it.''He's a fantastic talent and hopefully he continues doing it,'' Hussey said. ''Dave does it to me in the nets all the time and it frustrated me, so I beamed him. It didn't go down very well.''
I dont know what the fuss is all about. I love it.
If Warner is good enough to play a shot like that, then all you can do is sit back and enjoy the skill of Dave Warner. And if that doesnt get you excited, go and follow Lawn Bowls or something.
because its cheating and gives an unfair advantage. in league if someone threw the ball forward over the defensive line caught it themselves would you say he has enough skill to do it then sit back and enjoy it? you should go follow the baseball all star homw run derby and stop infecting the great game of cricket with your shit attitudes
Fancy a Storm fan having a whinge about cheating :lol:
Thats why you have 07 and 09 in your sig you trolling cretin.yes because a fan of the team who has nothing to to do with the running of the club obvisouly had a huge role to play in the cheating and was in on it all along and therefore can never be against cheating in any form. good one.
Thats why you have 07 and 09 in your sig you trolling cretin.
You learn't how to whack off????signifies years we made grand finals and there was positive experiences for the players. plus there were other positive life experiences for me personally in those years