Pathetic decision....
I wonder if Morley, Crocker, woolford would have got off last night under the same circumstances... id dont think so!
The review committee that is paid to make these decisions charged him and gave him 1 week, what does that say? And how do those blokes feel about being over ruled when they are the men hired to make the decisions. I would have took any bet that he got off.. why? Because with 2 games remaining would you risk losing him for both when you could know for sure that if they got past Manly, he would be there in the GF, unless of course they knew that he was a certainty to get off. I think the panel taking 10 mins to clear him knew before anyone walked in the room that he was gonna get off... it just makes a mockery of the game and its rules and its officials. As usual I would say the snouts are all in troughs and im not a Manly fan either but I am a fan of somebody that is put in a position to rule on these matters are over ruled, its just a mockery.
How could the review committee get it so wrong and charge him and give him 1 week, were they looking at a different video of the incident. No, they done their job that they are paid to do but obviously there were bigger noses in the troughs than theirs. If i was one of the committee members that gave him 1 week I would hand in my resignation and ask.. Why am i needed?
