El Diablo
Post Whore
- Messages
- 94,107
Mr Saab said:Yeah ok.
Thurston had koopu at 45 degrees.
Inu had bell at around 80 degrees.
you seriously need a new protractor
Mr Saab said:Yeah ok.
Thurston had koopu at 45 degrees.
Inu had bell at around 80 degrees.
Mr Saab said:In your "completely" unbiased eyes, do you believe that Inu should have been charged for that tackle....comparing that tackle to Thurstons.
Mr Sabb said:I dont give a shyte about the Cowboys so dont accuse me of bias as he is a QLDr.
El Diablo said:
you're not a Queenslansder so wtf are you on about :?
Clock watcher said:Anyway onward and upward
Bring on JT and the Broke Back Mountain Boys!!!!
Mr Saab said:I rest my case about you and bias.
Mr Saab said:I know, but you know i have not love for NSW.
El Diablo said:so because i don't agree with you i'm bias lol
great case you're trying![]()
then why have you spent your entire life living here?
move
Charlie124 said:ahahhahahaha, i laughed so hard a little wee came out, gold.
Mr Saab said:Inus tackle was fine was it?
Mr Saab said:Based up how they talk about going past the horizontal?
Was Bell more vertical than Koopu?
Mr Saab said:I shall be.
jabroni said:Spear chuckers! Imagine a mother seeing that tackle and the player not being suspended for it. Something with a small margin for error, realistically, the result could've and has been alot worse with player suffering terrible injuries from tackles that started the same way and ended a few degrees worse. I would not want my child playing football knowing that something like that should only deserve the same punishment as having your hand in the play the ball.
Absolute joke, then they wonder why we are losing more kids to afl, which have all but eliminated dangerous contact in their tackling. Disgraceful!
Yeah I realise that. But I was suggesting that Archer, who was on the field right in front of the incident and saw it happen, didn't deem it serious enough to report it. I don't think the referees are given enough leverage or credit anymore for making decisions on the field. Sometimes I wonder why they're even there.Mr Saab said:Just because a ref does not put it on report doesnt mean the player cant be charged by the MRC.
The report system is there only so the team can get a free interchange, no more no less.
Charlie124 said:small margin for error?? it WAS an error, you couldnt possibly believe it was deliberate.
if the result was a lot worse and the tackle was a few degrees worse, then it would have been looked at differently.
you have to look at what actually DID happen, not what might have happend if it was worse.
Charlie124 said:morely and ryles arent halfbacks tackling backrowers. and theyre both repeat offenders (thurstons other offence was completly unrelated)