Thursty gets off

[Clock watcher]

sits and awaits the personal attacks

 

[gong_eagle]

Dinner at Gallops tonight for him now

 

[Mr Saab]

sits and awaits the personal attacks

Keep watching the clock

 

[El Diablo]

For that EXACT same tackle....ok.

even for less

Bowman must be wondering why he was suspended by the judiciary not that long ago

 

[Mr Saab]

And Inu must be wondering how he was not even charged for his tackle on Bell

 

[sherrinator]

Different set of rules for superstars.

It's a load of crap. The NRL need to grow a set of nuts. Deadset. SBW, Thurston etc. don't get a fraction of the time they deserve because of their names.

If the Cowboys win this week, then this decision would have cost a deserving team a chance at the Grand Final (and a team that everyone hates... which works out i guess)

if the team is so deserving they would win whether or not thurston plays

if manly cant beat the cowboys you cant beat melbourne

 

[Hurriflatch]

What Inu tackle are you talking about, I honestly don't remeber anything, the Thurston tackle didn't deserve a suspension but I don't even recall Inu getting penalised for a tackle on Bell

 

[Mr Saab]

Watch the replay of NRL on Fox tonight or tomorrow (if you have Foxtel).
They show a tackle by Inu on Bell and it was way more horizontal than Thurstons.
There was no penalty and there was no charge.

 

[Eelectrica]

What Inu tackle are you talking about, I honestly don't remeber anything, the Thurston tackle didn't deserve a suspension but I don't even recall Inu getting penalised for a tackle on Bell

Says it all really. Inu's tackle was worse and it was a non-event.

 

[El Diablo]

Watch the replay of NRL on Fox tonight or tomorrow (if you have Foxtel).
They show a tackle by Inu on Bell and it was way more horizontal than Thurstons.
There was no penalty and there was no charge.

and the player didn't need to stick his arm out so his head wouldn't be driven into the turf like Koopu did in the Thurston tackle

 

[Mr Saab]

and the player didn't need to stick his arm out so his head wouldn't be driven into the turf like Koopu did in the Thurston tackle

He didnt get the chance to.
He was alot more vertical than Koopu was and driven down onto the tip of his shoulder.

 

[Clock watcher]

Keep watching the clock

LoL pay that one!!!!!
:lol:

 

[Clock watcher]

Anyway onward and upward
Bring on JT and the Broke Back Mountain Boys!!!!

 

[Scorpio30]

Watch the replay of NRL on Fox tonight or tomorrow (if you have Foxtel).
They show a tackle by Inu on Bell and it was way more horizontal than Thurstons.
There was no penalty and there was no charge.

:?

 

[El Diablo]

He didnt get the chance to.
He was alot more vertical than Koopu was and driven down onto the tip of his shoulder.

lol

it was more his back and shoulder, not tip. it didn't even look horizontal.

nice try though Chucky

 

[Mr Saab]

:?

Yeah ok.
Thurston had koopu at 45 degrees.
Inu had bell at around 80 degrees.

 

[Bomber]

Oh happy day....

 

[Pumba]

Suprise Suprise

 

[Mr Saab]

lol

it was more his back and shoulder, not tip. it didn't even look horizontal.

nice try though Chucky

In your "completely" unbiased eyes, do you believe that Inu should have been charged for that tackle....comparing that tackle to Thurstons.

I dont give a shyte about the Cowboys so dont accuse me of bias as he is a QLDr.

 

[_Johnsy]

Yeah ok.
Thurston had koopu at 45 degrees.
Inu had bell at around 80 degrees.

You did use a compass & protractor for those measurements saab ?:sarcasm: