TheBourbonBeast
Juniors
- Messages
- 801
I've seen it maybe a dozen times now, clear penalty for OBSTRUCTING Preston. He goes for Preston FIRST.
/thread
/thread
You are the moron you f**kwit.
What people are disagreeing on was that Orford WAS contesting primarily the man and not the ball. Like all decisions in league it was subjective and went one way and not the other, get over it.
Exactly, and this is what sh*ts me, all you whinging f**ks are going to achieve is make the refs gun shy at making calls, and if you are thick enough to think that this will improve the quality of officialdom then you deserve what you get.
Just wait till it happens to your team in a CRUCIAL game for once. Would be great to see your reaction if Broncos are sent packing in finals series due to a 'subjective' decision.
how can you say he wasn't contesting the ball when it was at prestons feet?
Have you even seen the incident, judging from your previous posts you are the village idiot.
Ahh the old 'wait till it's you'!
All decisions are subjective you moron.
Besides again was this decision right or wrong? I say it's is right, you say it's wrong, so which is it? Should the ref have your mobile number on him so he can put the game on hold whilst he checks with you which of the decisions is the right one?
What if this was a grandfinal and the ref didn't blow a penalty, how do you plan on appeasing all the pissed off people who felt the Titans were ripped off? Any thoughts champ?
Ahh the old 'wait till it's you'!
All decisions are subjective you moron.
Besides again was this decision right or wrong? I say it's is right, you say it's wrong, so which is it? Should the ref have your mobile number on him so he can put the game on hold whilst he checks with you which of the decisions is the right one?
What if this was a grandfinal and the ref didn't blow a penalty, how do you plan on appeasing all the pissed off people who felt the Titans were ripped off? Any thoughts champ?
Which will mean what exactly?
I'll help you out, sfa.
So for the people here defending it. Had the referee called play on/knock on, would you be blowing up? Would you have even noticed? Or would you simply say it was a good play by Orford? Some of you may say get over it, but that didn't just cost your team the season.
Your a strange personI think it was the wrong call, it makes the victory that much sweeter.
One decision hasn't cost you the season more than the actions of this man has:Some of you may say get over it, but that didn't just cost your team the season.
Only you and a select few of the bumbling idiots who just want to see Manly lose on this board are backing Ceccin in this case. Its not as if its a 50/50 call, it was just plain wrong. Just out of interest what were your views on the Idris no try last week?
f**k a few of you merkins dont have a clue on the game your watching, Orford went for the ball, Campbell fell over him, Orford knocks on, Titans scrum. Its really that simple.
Of course he fell over him, Orford stuck his legs out to ensure he did.
Burn. Have a happy 2010.
Actually losing by 20 would be worse, as that would indicate they were outclassed. However to lose by 1 because of a contentious refereeing decision.......well, like I said Sh*t happens. As for it hurting every day for the rest of the year :roll:.....I think you assume too much.If we win by 20 you put it down to a bad day, this way the loss will hurt you every day for the rest of the year, and the icing will be if you miss the 8 by a point.
As i say so much sweeter.
BTW you have had the explanation about 50/50 about 10 times, you choose to whinge and refuse to except, so enjoy your pain