Everlast, I'm, sorry you didn't have the intellectual capacity or means, let alone the drive to get to university and study a science such as physics or a humanity such as philosophy, but to defend toe poking in any era with regards round the corner is ridiculous and plain stupid. If you had got to a professional level of study, you'd have developed an ability to reason critically and realise this, or fallen by the wayside. But you didn't and thus you continually miss the point.
Now I am pleased for you that you spell 'ouija' but concerned you do not know what a spelling mistake is. Spelling a word out phoenetically is probally the second most common type of spelling mistake to typos. To be honest, I do not care I spelt the word phoenetically to you. One - you must be use to people not caring less about how they present their communication to you by now. Two - I'm surprised you know the spelling of a 19th century trademarked product with a hybrid French and German name. Three - writing to you does not necessitate me spell checking or looking through a dictionary because you're not worth the effort. Four - You got the intended meaning thus my idea was effectively communicated to you and no harm done. Thus you still got the benefit of my clear expression, even if it was spelt incorrectly. Now I do not know what your industry is, and good for you for being industrious and entreprenuerial, but my industry involves among other things reading and comprehension, process data into information, and critically analyse and construct arguments. I mean you no insult but believe me, you clearly just do not get it.
You appear to have the processing skills of an pre-enlightenment styled ignoramus being who is doctrinally engrained, the modern equivalent of which is commonly a religiously fundamental who would refute inductively prooved Darwinian arugments and still believe in divine creation till offered deductive proof for alternative claims. Except this is physics, and there is deductive proof - but you'd still deny it and claim to know more than the last 20 years of goal kickers, sport scientists and coaches who widely implement this superior method of round the corner. Round the corner kicks have more accuracy (through use of instep) and more distance (through use of hip movement) but you try to say its era specific. Its not - its a human body kicking a ball. Any ball, made of any material, on any ground, with or without a tee, sand or just a garss divet. Not only do you deny the decuctive evidence, you also deny the inductive evidence which refutes all your ridiculous claims beyond reasonable doubt, such as A Johns utilising D Halligan's coaching to kick round the corner better. Coaching helps round the corner kickers improve to greater auccuracy. Its a difficult task to perfect, much like a golf swing is. If it weren't common sense to you then I've offered the conclusive evidence.
I feel very sad for you that there must be so many things in life you cannot understand. It must be very frustrating for you. Still - you have your own business where uneducated people are useful to society.This is still commendable, even if it is not a service offered of the literal professions and a mere occupation. Good for you. I'd hate to think anyone who been through years of higher level education to sharpen their thought processes should have to work for a inconsistent and blunt sledge-hammer like you. It would be cruel and uncommon punishment for a sharp thinker to have to work for an intellectually-short-man such as yourself who possesses a chip on his shoulder toward the intelligent and educated because he lacks the ability to reason and understand.
League was behind the times with limited use and success of round-the-corner kicking in the 1980's compared to union. Round the corner did not come after synthetic balls, tees and manicured grounds - it came before. This a key fact you manage to miss and ignore. Another one is that if manicured grounds (stable footing - more essential for toe poking as you're not stabilising your balance by pivoting on a foot), tees (merely placing the ball ready to be kicked) and synthetic balls offered a significant advantage to kicking accuracy, those very same advantages would be of benefit to toe pokers as well, thus if it was a better technique it would still be used today. Toe poking is not used today, though. The advantages of quality round the corner kicking over toe poking was widely accepted and became the norm well before synthetic balls, tees, and manicured grounds. League has subsequently caught up to other codes thanks in a large part to the success of Ridge and subsequent work of people such as Halligan and Botica. Its plain and simple. Your inabaility to grasp this I think your could blame on your lack of education, but personally at your age, I think its just your very limited intelligence.
